comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Justice james randy moore - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Fifth District reverses dismissal of motion to void sentencing in murder case

Fifth District affirms Threlkeld in insurance dispute involving faulty elevators

The Fifth District Appellate Court affirmed several orders by Madison County Circuit Judge Christopher Threlkeld in a general contractor’s lawsuit alleging its insurer should be compelled to defend an underlying suit involving faulty elevators.

Sandberg Phoenix, attorneys appeal Fifth District s punitive damages ruling to Illinois Supreme Court | Madison

A St. Louis law firm and two attorneys are petitioning the Illinois Supreme Court to review the Fifth District Appellate Court’s ruling that punitive damages are recoverable in legal malpractice cases.

Fifth District says punitive damages are recoverable in legal malpractice suit involving $785K jury verdict

Moore The Fifth District Appellate Court held that punitive damages are recoverable in legal malpractice cases, concluding that in such circumstances the punitive damages are “compensatory in nature.”  “In short, we agree that punitive damages that are assessed against a litigant as a proximate result of the professional negligence of its attorney are not, in the context of a subsequent legal malpractice action against the attorney, punitive in nature but are, indeed, compensatory in nature and therefore not barred …” wrote Justice James Randy Moore in the ruling.  Moore delivered the April 28 opinion with justices Mark Boie and John Barberis concurring. 

Fifth District: Punitive damages are recoverable in legal malpractice suit involving $785K jury verdict

Moore The Fifth District Appellate Court held that punitive damages are recoverable in legal malpractice cases, concluding that in such circumstances the punitive damages are “compensatory in nature.”  “In short, we agree that punitive damages that are assessed against a litigant as a proximate result of the professional negligence of its attorney are not, in the context of a subsequent legal malpractice action against the attorney, punitive in nature but are, indeed, compensatory in nature and therefore not barred …” wrote Justice James Randy Moore in the ruling.  Moore delivered the April 28 opinion with justices Mark Boie and John Barberis concurring. 

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.