Everyone. Es from this is a very important issue to me. Im happy married 29 years and have four daughters so this is an issue i wont be saying these have daughters but very four daughtersnt make it personal. E, wife has been very activ shes on the board of an Organization Called International Center for research on women. Which deals with womens issues around the world. And the war were seeing waged on womens reproductive freedom erica United States of am is administration is also doing globally by the way. Of women w conditions laces the world this many are just horrific. Rights lobal human tragedy. And so not only need voices issues, asout womens it relates to domestic policy but we do as it relates to International Policy as well. I believe the United States of america has an obligation to lead on these issues. Orts overwhelming if you supp women, in destabilized parts of the world, its the fastest way places into stabilized areas. Youre not only different voices informing your poli
You ready to get started . All dont know are you ready to get started . Wave so ittle and know you are ready to get started. Taskednd i have been with getting everyone ready to go. I am excited to start the second part of our program today. We still have a ton of candidates to hear from. Articulate howto to protect access as well as be bold and visionary. We have talked about health care across the state and the nation. Are you hearing what you want to hear . Ok. A couple of reminders. Remember, the first one is one diva, one mic. Soour storytellers are being brave and sharing their testimonies that we are listening to them. Onond ground rule, we are the records show our hair is right and tight. Is a do not, this shade environment. We want to lift up candidates when they share something that we like. , be present. Ly as vicki said earlier, our power is in this room. This is a powerful room so stay with us because we know we are going to hear a lot of great stuff today. Are we all good
the courthouse. lisa rubin, catherine christian and caroline polisi. thank you all for being with us. in the meantime, ken, what can we expect from this hearing and remind us of the parameters of the current gag order. reporter: it prohibits former president trump from criticizing the prosecutor, special counsel jack smith and members of his team, court personnel and witnesses or potential witnesses in the case. it does not prohibit him from criticizing the justice department or the biden administration or saying that this entire prosecution is corrupt. but what the judge concludes is when former president trump makes specific attacks on individuals on social media, it s often the case that those individuals are then harassed and targeted by trump followers. that happened in the case of the judge herself, who was the target of a death threat after former president trump criticized her. so former president trump s lawyers are saying this is a violation of his first amendment
Thought that, yes, the law was riddled with genderbased distinctions, but they all operated benignly in womens favor. Like a woman didnt have to serve on a jury if she didnt want to, so that was a benefit. The eavesdropping reflected curiosity, and i think that thats what drove me as a lawyer. I mean, i always tell people and its not a perfect analogy but being a lawyer is like being a voyeur in other peoples lives. You participate a little more than voyeurs do, thankfully, but in every case you get to learn how people or an industry or a Government Entity interacts in the world, what they do and whats important to them, and to be able to enjoy that process, i think you have to have curiosity. So listening to others and their conversations was a way of teaching myself things that i would not have otherwise learned so easily. Rose binz gr ginsburg and sotomayor for the hour. And by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and Information Services worldwide. Captioning sponsored by Rose
Thought that, yes, the law was riddled with genderbased distinctions, but they all operated benignly in womens favor. Like a woman didnt have to serve on a jury if she didnt want to, so that was a benefit. The eavesdropping reflected curiosity, and i think that thats what drove me as a lawyer. I mean, i always tell people and its not a perfect analogy but being a lawyer is like being a voyeur in other peoples lives. You participate a little more than voyeurs do, thankfully, but in every case you get to learn how people or an industry or a Government Entity interacts in the world, what they do and whats important to them, and to be able to enjoy that process, i think you have to have curiosity. So listening to others and their conversations was a way of teaching myself things that i would not have otherwise learned so easily. Rose binz gr ginsburg and sotomayor for the hour. And by bloomberg, a provider of multimedia news and Information Services worldwide. Captioning sponsored by Rose