Have extended but what happens here is the president and secretary went to the office of Legal Counsel to scope their authority of the Discretionary Authority and consistently with that so whenever the president may have meant we went to the process to act on that conclusion. Is no challenge to dapa. As a legal matter. I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. Chief justice of that may please the court the texas mothers of u. S. Citizen children have the opportunity to apply for discretionary temporary lease from the daily fear they will be separated from their families and decayed or removed from their homes from the frequently arbitrary enforcement system that fails to provide a reliable opportunity to be identified as a low priority their own state of texas through this suit has blocked the guidance. It to register and apply with a timely decision with a fax to defer action. It is on the indirect and speculative injury to contradict the states old legislative decision after balancing co
Anniversary of the appointment of John Marshall to the Supreme Court. The capstone of that particular evening was a rousing lecture by Justice Scalia about the importance of John Marshall to the history of the court and the history of the country. Justice scalia was a grand friend of both the Marshall Foundation and the Supreme Court Historical Society. I hope you will join me in just a moment of silence to remember Justice Scalia. Thank you. We are grateful this evening that the court, chief Justice Roberts and his colleagues, allow the Supreme Court Historical Society to continue using this courtroom for its programs. It is a gift to us, and we are grateful. At this juncture, normally, i would have a few remarks to introduce our distinguished host for the evening. But it seems that chief Justice Roberts is on a tight schedule this evening, we are lucky to get him here. He has asked that his introduction be as brief as possible. Since we are so grateful to chief Justice Roberts for hi
Adult and receive medical care that is against their religion. So, there are loads of things. Ive just given you four. Think of the taxes. Theres no question that doesnt violate the religious clause, but plenty of other things do. So, whats the line . Why do the quakers have to pay the taxes for vietnam . But you dont find the religious jew or muslim getting an extra day off in the week when the law says nobody can work on sunday because their sabbath is on saturday. What is the line . Ive been reading and reading to try to find a fairly clear, simple statement of what that line is and how it works and to repeat the difficulty of sherbert and verner, which is what rfra does, quite honestly, doesnt help me, but you might. Im going to try. Im going to reserve my time for rebuttal. I would say youre exactly right, that smith was a more administerable world but Congress Tell me absolutely, heres way you work it and draw the line, you first ask, is there a substantial burden on religious ex
Provision of the constitution and the begin by drafting a common statement and then they statementseparate describing areas of disagreement. You can have confidence that every word in these statements is one that both sides can accept. I am thrilled to report that the College Board has decided to make this tool is centerpiece of the new ap history and u. S. Government exams and i encourage all of you to check it out and learn from it. We think that it has the potential to transform constitutional education in america. The greatest and during influence is not only that he won over jeffersonian on the court, but he encouraged others by exhibiting a similar willingness to restrain the personal views for the sake of unanimity and institutional harmony. There are so many favorite famous tributes to marshall. A biography on Daniel Webster prices marshall for the prevalence of sound constitutional opinion that held the union together. Authors but should be did this to a large, sweet nature wh
City taxi and Limousine Commission as well as chicagos. What we found is the number of taxi complaints per ride drastically decreased when uber and lift entered the market. Now, keep in mind this wasnt just long hauls. These were things like broken air conditioning, rudeness, radio too loud, or not loud enough, issues that, for example, if youve rid en in a taxi in d. C. , they have the taxicab riders bill of rights. These things have all been mandated, but whether or not theyre being achieved is left up to debate, but the entry of these new competitors is certainly forcing the current incumbents to become better. But its also providing an alternative for consumer who is might not otherwise choose to ride in a taxi or unhappy with the current offerings, it gives them Something Different and something more. The second point. There are real issues of fairness. Dean will speak about that as well. I do want to note one thing. When it comes to state and local regulators, theres essentially