The plea had been filed for declaration of Satyendar Jain as a person of unsound mind and to disqualify him from being a member of Delhi legislative assembly.
The Bench was hearing petitions challenging the validity of Rules 9 to 11 of the BCI Rules for being violative of Section 16, 24 and 30 of the Advocates Act and Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
During the hearing, Justice Kaul recommended that the difficulty level of the AIBE should be determined based on the number of enrolled advocates required in the country.
Instead of felicitating Chief Justice of India (CJI) UU Lalit with bouquets and mementos, the Maharashtra government should felicitate him by allocating land for the new Bombay High Court complex, Justice AS Oka said.
The petitioner argued that the compensation of ₹2 lakhs was severely inadequate particularly in light of its delayed payment and urged the court to reconsider this aspect.