that s probably pretty shocking but i think it was a horrible decision by judge williams and i m glad that porter s team is appealing this to a higher level. ted, when i saw it i thought what was he thinking? the judge or maybe drinking. why would he do this? it really does make this other officer unfairly vulnerable. it makes the officer vulnerable in many areas. just think about it. jury poll that s out there is listening and seeing all that s going on here. where you want to bring porter in, now, this was a desperate attempt by mosby who rushed to prosy(ueuz this case. she has called porter a liar. if porter is a lure and the prosecutors believe is he a liar. how can they now vouch for his credibility? so there are many problems here, but i have a feeling, greta, that the court of special appeals allow this guy constitutional right to go down the drain.
nerding out, and seema ire, host of the docket, and a criminal defense attorney who was formerly a prosecutor in the bronx district attorney s office. and raul reyes. the first thing they re going to ask the jurors in the jury poll have you been exposed to the riots. that s really important. and what side they fell on. the other big issue which is always an issue i think when you re trying cases involving police witnesses is their feelings towards law enforcement. then finally, what do you know about the case and is that going to affect your ability to be fair and impartial. there has been a lot of effort on the part of the defense attorneys to move this out baltimore and this judge keeps saying, no, we re going to do this here. the judge is absolutely
justice system. now they are going to have to prove each and every police officer guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. when i say beyond a reasonable doubt, every element of the charged crime has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt including criminal intention. criminal intent is critical to every charge. it s a whole new ball game now. the defense lawyers are doing what they should do, attacking these charges, held substantial the evidence is, playing to the jury poll when they file these motions. it s a new game now. it s not that easy to convict all these people beyond a reasonable doubt i don t think. i think the last point that you re making about this being a new game, a game now where defense attorneys are actively involved here, police and interested parties, police unions and interested party. without substance of the leagues, the fact they are happening says a lot about the atmosphere under which this case will now be tried.
but there is security camera footage of the couple entering the night and e-mailing a çfrid also about her dance moves. prosecutors plan to call half of the friends who say that the marriage was disaster waiting to happen. they said she was silent. cody was different but moved away with the marriage anyway. cody put in 110 percent. and we were not sure if she felt the same way. reporter: prosecutors expect it to last ten days. the jury poll is 150 people because so many people in montana who know about the case, prosecutors are concerned about eliminating bis and getting
effect the trial. all they show is a guy coming out of the boat. there are about 500 cops in three or four news networks who were witnessing that as it happened as well. these photos will have no impact on the trial whatsoever. that is just nonsense. mike: jeffrey, how does this really effect? it s not like they are showing autopsy photos and things that are grotesque. they are showing the actual event. i guarantee if you a news cam ha rah had been there and could have captured it. it would have been live on every news channel on america. because what he is trying to do is taint the prospective jury poll. the clever little cop that he is and then is he going to make sure that the case gets booted around to some other part of massachusetts so it can t even be heard in massachusetts. and that s a dirtiest trick. look, there are a lot of different ways to look at a story. i understand the principle of both following the rules of evidence and following the rules of the cops but the i