Page 8 - Jury Didn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20180822:04:56:15
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
the defendant had given several explanations to law enforcement is my understanding, not only idea of gun just going off but said at one point he stepped on it or kicked it, didn t he? reporter: he gave rambling and conflicting statements. doesn t have all his cognitive abilities, acknowledged. jury seemed to overlook it. at one point said he was aiming at sea lion. another point said just five feet away from kate steinle when the gun went off, when in reality, about 100 feet away. whatever he told the police, jury didn t put much credence in it. and it s interesting that prosecutors gave the jury a number of options. as you said, first, second degree murder and manslaughter and found him not guilty on all countries. reporter: certainly did. conventional wisdom was if not going to find him guilty of murder, at least of involuntary manslaughter. but that was not the case. one thing that we should point
abilities, acknowledged. jury seemed to overlook it. at one point said he was aiming at sea lion. another point said just five feet away from kate steinle when the gun went off, when in reality, about 100 feet away. whatever he told the police, jury didn t put much credence in it. and it s interesting that prosecutors gave the jury a number of options. as you said, first, second degree murder and manslaughter and found him not guilty on all countries. reporter: certainly did. conventional wisdom was if not going to find him guilty of murder, at least of involuntary manslaughter. but that was not the case. one thing that we should point out anderson, the weapon used in this, it was stolen from a bureau of land management agent. in san francisco with his family on vacation and gun was stolen. they were never able to link
minutes waiting to inflict the maximum amount of damage. there were tears from the jurors, nothing from tsarnaev in court. the only time he showed any emotion is with his aunt on the stand and she started crying about his upbringing. i think the jury didn t buy it. they also didn t buy that tsarnaev was enslaved by his brother, that he was manipulated. they felt he was a participant in this terrorist act. here is how a few survivors reacted to the news. my mother and i think that now he can go away and we will be able to move on. justice. in our own words an eye for an eye. another wrote my heart is with the entire survivor community. i am thrilled with the verdict. and another who had her left(ít leg amputated, she wrote, completely numb and waiting anxiously for the day that this is really
the jury decided unanimously beyond a reasonable doubt that there was no remorse. so, all that could be said about family about his youth about lack of prior complications, when something this horrible happens by somebody who reflects no kpungs no remorse that s a death penalty case. what about the character witness saying that he was truly sorry for what he had done? was that dismissed of the good intentions of somebody that is against the death penalty? yeah i think if jury didn t buy it. there was no remorse demonstrated in court. the nurses, the nun s testimony was the only evidence that he actually showed any feeling. he never cried during the trial during testimony showed absolutely no emotion. martin richard s dad was describing how his son was blown up. it was testimony that tsarnaev stood there for a number of
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.