acquittal of kate steinle s suspected murderer. will tax reform get through congress before the end of the year? we ll get into all of that when we continue. and saving so much money on their car insurance by switching to geico. well, just look at this setting. do you have the ring? oh, helzberg diamonds. another beautiful setting. i m not crying. i ve just got a bit of sand in my eyes, that s all. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. grandma s. aunt stacy s. what are the reasons you care for your heart? qunol coq10 with 3x better absorption has the #1 cardiologist recommended form of coq10 to support heart health. qunol, the better coq10.
a heart attack doesn t or how healthy you look. no matter who you are, a heart attack can happen without warning. a bayer aspirin regimen can help prevent another heart attack. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. bayer aspirin. more now on breaking news. jury found undocumented immigrant not guilty of murder in killing of woman in san francisco, kate steinle, a case that president seized on to bolster anti-immigration campaign. family member brad statement. i m not surprised. system failed kate from this start of this events. why would the verdict be any different. not detained by i.c.e. failure after failure. epic fail. doesn t affect us in any way. kate is gone.
levels of killing is how you frame narrative of intent. reckless, careless, intentional, trying to harm somebody? accident? seems like way it was framed to the jury, ricochet had the ultimate impact. and being able to undermine any conceivable notion perhaps this was intended to shoot the person who was shot, kate steinle in this case. although the possession would tell you that obviously had it and possession led to a killing of this young woman, but the intent portion of it is so pivotal to any jury considering it, i find it not shocking to me they didn t have conviction in this case based on this theory. important point. if hadn t been ricochet but direct shot, might have been manslaughter or something else? would have been a very key and pivotal change to the entire prosecution s case. theory of course is they thought
apparently that s what they did. did convict of illegal possession of the weapon but when you consider the magnitude of the loss and death of kate steinle, it s a very minor conviction. i want to bring in laura coates, as well. if he s guilty of possession of the weapon and it was fired, why wouldn t that be manslaughter? a much lower bar to meet. of course. seems counterintuitive to people, however the possession has to be different from manslaughter. matter of intent. way the law structures different levels of intentional or unintentional killings, is how you frame narrative of intent. reckless, careless, intentional, trying to harm somebody? was it an accident? seems like way it was framed to the jury, ricochet had the ultimate impact. and being able to undermine any conceivable notion perhaps this was intended to shoot the person who was shot, kate steinle in this case.
return criminal aliens to the state rather than turning over to federal authorities put the public safety at risk. san francisco s decision led to preventible and heartbreaking death of kate steinle. already taking aim at san francisco s position as sanctuary city. heard the president decry them numerous times in the campaign and since taken office. seen in the clip and spent time on the campaign trail. huge issue he brought up many times. reporter: it was. immigration was central issue when he entered the presidential race. campaigned on. when he learned kate steinle s story, something the president latched on to and used as example, rallying cry for tougher immigration policies throughout the presidential campaign. so we re waiting to see if the