your view? i certainly hope that that is not the way others are following these practices. me, too. okay. so let s fast forward now to june of 2016. mr. klein smith, who is he? i m going to defer on speaking about people who we don t name basically in the report. who is the guy tell me about the guy that altered the email from the c.i.a. so there was a lawyer in the office of general counsel at the f.b.i. who was the line attorney working with the agents and counterparts at the national security division on the fisa. and that individual in june of 2017 as the last application was being prepared and immediately following mr. page, carter page going to news
it s illegal surveillance, it is not court authorized surveillance. whatever illegal surveillance means, they did it. so all the stuff that they didn t illegally surveil trump s campaign they did. they had no legal basis after the january 2017 data dump by the russian guy to believe that the dossier was reliable. they altered exculpatory information in june of 2017 that would have further proven that carter page is not a russian agent. he was actually working for the c.i.a. let me ask you a very directly. do you believe carter page is or ever was an agent of the russian government trying to do harm to his country? i m going the refer to the evidence we found here, which is that if i m going to read this, the f.b.i. at the end of these fisas told us they had found no evidence to
people. are they representative of the department as a whole in your view? i certainly hope that that is not the way others are following these practices. yeah, me, too. okay. let s fast forward to june of 2016. mr. klein smith. who is he? i m going to defer on speaking about people who we don t name specifically in the report. tell me about the guy that altered the email from the cia. there was a lawyer in the office of general counsel of the fbi who was the line attorney working with the agents and counterparts at the national security division on the fisa. and that individual in june of 2017, as the last application was being prepared and
bad? absolutely. is that spying? it s illegal surveillance. it s not court authorized whatever illegal surveillance means, they did it. so all this stuff that they didn t illegally surveil trump s campaign, they did because they had no legal basis after the january 2017 data dump by the russian guy to believe that the dossier was reliable. they alter exculpatory information in june of 2017 that would have further proven that carter page is not a russian agent who was actually working with the cia. let me ask you directly, do you believe carter page was or ever was an agent of the russian government trying to do harm to his country? i m going to refer to the evidence we found here which is that thank you. they, the fbi at the end of
century, they re going to be mining social media. they ll be looking for whatever digital imprint or digital exhaust this attacker might have left behind. london officials have declared this a terrorist incident. i want to be careful not to jump to conclusions before we know more, but does this have the markings of any specific group? it does. i heard some terrorism experts talk about this. this appears to be the type of extremist similar in nature to the one that happened a couple months ago in june of 2017. that was an attack by isis. now, no terror group has come out and claimed responsibility for this. and for police, while we assume terrorism, meaning there was some political goal or aim that was associated with the violence or the intimidation or the threats of saying, we always have to be cautious to follow the evidence where it takes us. i assume once police have more information on this, they ll be releasing it fairly soon. the as always, james gagliano,