happen. this was direct intent. juan: i would say in my own defense, it is time for shark- shark-nado, a lot of people would watch that show. forcing him to reenact those text. great television. juan: talk about jumping the shark. dana: that is the point. it s a congressional hearing. i think it drove the point home on how perfectly biased those things that he was saying. he had to reiterate it and everyone at home was like to jesse: he was removed from the mueller probe for bias. the ig says he was biased and he s still being investigated for bias. juan: the ig report said it didn t affect his work. jesse: it said it couldn t prove.
isn t in the white house, giving president trump advice. he should be on the firing line if anybody should, not his wife. rob, what do you think? you ve known bill shine for a decade. i agree with margaret. i would not hold whatever sins we re trying to put on darla on to bill shine or white house. by the way, i listened to the clip, read entire transcript from a lot of different shows on the website, talking about vaccinations and all these things, you have to read them in totality. even in antivaccinations right? not going to even say controversial. now you re jumping the shark. not related to sexual harassment at all. in all of things, a hint of poking fun, come on, befo before #metoo movement, maybe ahead of her time.
this is a cruel, cold con artist neil: and you want to negotiate with him. you called me a cruel, con artist, congressman, i m not going to negotiate twinkies with you. that s what hurts the debate, right? neil, this man is cruelly separated kids from their parents. put them in cages. now he wants a medal? neil: he doesn t want a medal and he reversed himself. he gave ground on something. there s a lot of common ground here. it can t be had when both sides are calling each other names and you did that. those are not nice words. one of the things he left out, he thinks the president hates kids. he has kids and grandkids. so you re jumping the shark when you make that argument. i ve had disparaging comments out of republicans. no matter what side you re on,
lot of hypocrisy going around about people who criticize president obama for even setting foot in cuba and not only that, he set up next to fidel castro and talked about human rights abuses. the resin option for this president who proy to be chu ang towards dictators all over the world to not mention human rights abuses. i think that s a missed opportd from that of clips, the one thing t really stuck out to me is a legitimate criticism as you could ve said something. stay when i think that s really jumping the shark. melissa: they talked about human rights. harris: to say that this president is going to do that. japan just sat down with him and said can you get back the 17 hostages? there were hundreds of japanese hostages inside north korea. people didn t think the president was not concentrating on human rights. they wouldn t be asking for his help. melissa: i watched a press conference at 4:00 this morning and he said they talked about human rights.
amazing when topics that have no conceivable connection get pulled in, how did that happen? the point of the article is simple. most issues go through these long cycles lots of early interests, the press gets onto it, a flurry of political activity, policies are made, then we start having consideration trade-offs. if that s been going on with global warming for several year years. it s really expensive to do what a lot of the climatistas want us to do. we need to consider of gender and climate justice, that s jumping the shark. public opinion surveys showed declining public interest in the darn thing. tucker: it s a boutique issue for rich people but it s also confusing. even if you think that climate justice is real or if you can explain what it is i ve never met anyone who can or you think gender equality is an important part of this, what does that