roger want to know what does he have? neither one of you were part of a conspiracy to steal information from anybody nor did you steal any information from anybody. the president 6-3 decision in the pentagon papers case, the u.s. against the new york times clearly states that the times had a right to publish information as long as they didn t steal it. and you were requesting information and trying to find information like many others in the media what was coming next, correct? you are exactly right, sean. we had a right to do this. every journalist and person involved in political operations and the campaign julian assange not only dropped 40,000 emails debbie wasserman schultz july 22nd, 2016, within a day or two he said he had more emails to come. and, of course, the speculation was rampant. i wanted to know. irving wanted to know. i paused on a couple of
email and my text messages, there is no corroboration whatsoever for this. and as for my email exchange with steve bannon, everything i told him in the exchange was hepublicly reported information. politico reported that after assange announced on october 1st that he hadad nothing that day but would have releases every week for the next 10 weeks and that all information on the election, pertaining to the election, would be released in the weeks before the election. that was public information.ti and it had also been reported that assange had security concerns that day. so the two things i toldty bannon were public information, not the slightest bit controversial. as for the claim that tucker: when and how did you learn that wikileaks had these stolen emails? when julian assange said it on cnn on july 22nd, 2016, and then repeated it on fox on august 24th, this was not a state secret.
roger want to know is, what does he have? neither one of you were part of a conspiracy to steal information from anybody, nor did you steal any information fromd anybody. the precedent 6-3 decision in the pentagon papers case, new york times, clearly states that the times had a right to publish information as long as they didn t steal it.. andd you were requesting information and trying to find information like many others in the media, what was coming next, correct? you are exactly right, sean.ng we had a right to do this. every journalist and person involved in political operations and the campaigns, julian assange not only dropped 40,000 emails of debbie wasserman schultz july 22nd, 2016, within a day or two he said he had more emails to come. and, of course, the speculation was rampant. i wanted to know.. everybody wanted to know.
email, and my text messages, there is no corroboration whatsoever for this. and as for my email exchange with steve bannon, everything i told him in the exchange was publicly reported information. political report is that after assange announced on october 1st that he had nothing that day but would have releases every week for the next 10 weeks and that all information on the election pertaining to the election would be released in the weeks before the election. that was public information. and it had also been reported that assange had security concerns that day. so the two things i told bannon were public information, not the slightest bit controversial. as for the claim that tucker: when and how did you learn that wikileaks had these stolen emails? when julian assange said it on cnn on july 22nd, 2016, and then repeated it on fox on august 24th this was not a state secret.
national security advisor mike flynn, and campaign chairman paul manafort. stone, former business partner. what is this about? it s about silencing me. there s a war on alternative media. there s a war where they re trying to criminalize political expression. from the indictment after the july 22nd, 2016 release of stolen dnc e-mails a senior trump campaign official was directed to contact stone about additional releases and what other damaging information organization one, meaning wikileaks, had regarding the clinton campaign. i have to speculate about that, since it never happened, it appears that they have composed testimony for some one. perhaps rick gates, steve ban on. the indictment allegation stone told another with it to do a frank pantangelli, from the godfather 2. after stone s arrest today, the president tweeted, greatest