harry, let me start with you on was trekted, had strikes me as the most flashing neon sign and most legal significance for the president. after july 22nd, 2016, a senior trump campaign official was dreked, amazing use of the passive voice and what other damaging information they had regarding the clinton campaign what do you think of that? instantly famous use of the passive voice. sort of identify but not name an individual but that would rnlt have been part of the narrative of this indictment so it screams out now it s almost certain that the directee here is steve bannon so who can boss steve bannon around and direct him to shake
cevallos our legal analyst. i want to start right now with the more interesting bit that a lot of people are parsing right now from that indictment there, anna, after the july 22nd, 2016, release of the stolen dnc emails by organization 1, wikileaks, a senior trump campaign official was directed to contact stone about any additional releases and what other damaging information, organization 1 had regarding the clinton campaign. a senior campaign official. so who is that? that s the big question. who s the senior campaign official and it sounds like there was more than one senior campaign official who wanted to know, who wanted to get information from roger stone about what julian assange had. what you see in this indictment, they lay out robert mueller lays out this months long attempt to find out what is julian assange have, can we get it early, can we get messages to
hold my beer. nick akerman and the editor of abovethelaw.com well, another one of president trump s confidants in trouble after his pre-dawn arrest in florida telling prosecutors he will not plead guilty. i will plead not guilty to these charges. there is no circumstance whatsoever under which i will bear false witness against the president. i have made it clear i will not testify against the president. there was no mention of roger stone yesterday in the rose garden at the white house as one paragraph in robert mueller s filing is scrutinized after the july 22nd, 2016 release of stolen remails by organization
want to use that has to concern the president. and if he s saying who did direct them to do this? tid i maybe? thank you both. harry, let me start with you on was trekted, had strikes me as the most flashing neon sign and most legal significance for the president. after july 22nd, 2016, a senior trump campaign official was dreked, amazing use of the passive voice and what other damaging information they had regarding the clinton campaign. what do you think of that? instantly famous use of the passive voice.
ultimately be charged with. they felt like he had not concluded, th colluded. that he had not obstructed justice. think the question going forward is what does the special counsel s office want him for? do they want him on these obstruction of justice charges because they do think he could provide more information about his contact with wikileaks and his contact with the campaign and ultimately they want to put pressure on him and they want him to cooperate? or are they looking to bring these charges against him and to move forward and do they not need his help and his participation? and that s still a very open question there. all right, sara, we have to let you go for just a moment to do more reporting and read through this. garrett and anne, stick around. one more thing i want to read and we ll take a quick break because we re going to digest this all. but i want to read and that get your reaction. after the july 22nd, 2016 release of stolen dnc e-mails by organization one, that s