Be other residential customers who will be likely hearing about the cleanpower sf program and they might say even though were not on their front porch and that is great and we will add them to the list of customers who will receive the opt out notice. There are those from the group they will say i heard about this and i dont want it. Okay we hear you. Youre not part of target group and there is a mention of it in the data base. We have a question. Thank you. Im in the same section youre talking about on the notification piece and i wanted to comment on the new emerging demographic that we all recognized from the last election that i think has huge potential to be participants and be excited about this program and young communities of color and different kinds of communities that before hadnt been as engaged, and it seems like a way to engage and educate those communities that really around social media, and i saw in here there is a big focus working with cbos and operating their networ
And during the time as i hold the office of for the city and county of San Francisco. Congratulations and thank you very much happy new year everyone. Thank you clapping the title is up, go ahead. Okay. The january, meeting of the San Francisco Ethics Commission will now come to order. First thing that i would like to wish all of my fellow commissionerers a happy new year, it is kind of the end of january, but it is still the beginning of the year and we have not seen each other for quite some time and i hope that you had a Great Holiday and it is good to see you again, and happy new year to all of you in the audience as well and we are glad that you could join us today. Roll call . Commissioner renne . Present. Commissioner andrews . Here. Commissioner hur . Here. Commissioner keen, n here. Are there matters that we are going to be discussing or do not appear on the agenda at this time . Good evening commissioners my name is dr. Derek kur a whistle blower, please note bill 496 that to
Public. Madam chair . I have not challenged the staff and i am complimenting the staff and in regard to one thing that i dont understand that commissioner renne said is that if we wanted to discuss this, and we go into it, and it would have to be done in the private session and i am looking here at the letter that i got from mr. St. Croix, relating to this matter, and when i first got it. And in the final paragraph, he says, due to the fppc public deliberation adecember macing of the attached exhibit they have advised the staff that the Ethics Commission should be conducted in open session, not in private. Okay. You said that it has to be done in a private session, that is not what mr. St. Croix is saying here, that is not what the City Attorney is saying. But we do it in open session and, that is what we are doing now. Because it was requested that we put it on the calendar. And i am sorry, could i just quickly interject . I think that the discussion is getting too far afield from the
There are no further questions or comments can i ask something . Sure commissioner wynns. I wanted to see and i see mr. Armtrout is here and i dont know when the appropriate time is but to have a hearing on the after school yes. After School Coordination program pending. Supervisor farrell did call for this hearing i believe in november. At the beginning of november i planned to agendize this in february. Supervisor farrell if you have any additional comments but we will make sure that dcyf as well as the School District is there. I am assuming that supervisor farrells office will be organizing the series of presentations along with you because i know commissioner wynns you also sponsored the same resolution at the School District and looking forward to that as well so if we can have a motion to continue the item to the call of the chair i will make sure that we have another presentation from the citys perspective and what is happening with the Developers Perspective and also the citys
Department, and if we go. Off of the document, and into some details about the investigation, we may have to pull back from there. The bottom line in the settlement is that altogether there are several findings of violation of state and local law. For the purposes of simplification they have settled with the respondent for 3500 for a violation of section 8986 of the government code and the Ethics Commission has four counts of finding a violation in here. The first two counts reflect that the same section of the code that has been adopted for the local code and so for the purposes of the settlement, the state portion of the settlement covers the two and for the other two countses, two and three and four where we proposed and the respondent accepted 2500 each for those two and a total of 5,000 local for a grand total of the settlement for 8500 from the respondent and additionally, the respondent has repaid in the figure 17 . Approximately. Approximately 17,000 in salary that she received