campos-duffy and sean duffy of wisconsin also known as mr. rachel. i bet you love that, too. you got the right title there. julie: absolutely. you two know each other, right? don t you have a kid or two together? so cute. your kids are the cutest. i do congressional events now people say you come to the event. as long as you bring rachel. hot ticket item. they have their priorities. [laughter] they are watching the right channel. love it. julie: after months of investigating president trump sends written responses to questions into rush meddling into the 2016 election. the president is speaking to reporters before heading to mar-a-lago for the holiday, again, slamming the probe. watch this. the written answers to the witch-hunt that s been going on forever, no collusion, no nothing. they have been finished,
finished them yesterday. julie: the president s lawyer rudy giuliani suggesting the president would rye resist any subpoena but predicts mueller won t actually issue one. he tells axios and i m quoting i think that he would not win a legal battle if he did that and i think it would consume months. i don t think he has any way to compel testimony on obstruction because the argument of executive privilege would be very, very strong. it all relates to period of time after he was president. giuliani also said he can t tell if mueller has given up on obstruction but says he thinks their obstruction case as a legal matter doesn t exist. rachel, let me start with you. first of all, 1.4 million pages that the administration has turned over in this investigation. he has now answered these questions. they are all mainly russia-related. giuliani says that they are completely out of line. is the investigation far-reaching? are they running out of
lisa: even if the written format, what sort of legal liability does president trump face in answering these questions? sean: listen, if you have a prosecutor who is trying to catch you can say you fluid answering the question. lisa: do you think the case mueller? sean: i m concerned. mueller is a republican and mueller was a conservative. but when you build your team around a whole bunch of democrat donors or hillary clinton donors that lean left, you lose the appearance of impartiality. and i think there is a lot of great prosecutors, a lot of great investigators that mueller could have built his team around that have not given any money to republicans or democrats. he chose to take some left leaners that gives me some pause in concern. julie: he is still in charge. bein being a republican doesn t mean necessarily that you are agreeing with trump s version of events. there is plenty of knives out to get donald trump. doesn t mean get him neither necessarily.
justify all ca how about the truth? truth will set you free they say. julie: moving on. president trump fighting back against the thriewlg blocked his policy on asylum seekers. what he says will happen. and if his criticisms are fair? also, lawmakers now looking into ivanka trump s email use as the president and some republicans come to her defense whether an investigation is necessary and how this all compares to the hillary clinton scandal. we ll debate next. there was no deleting like hillary clinton did. there was no service in the basement like hillary clinton had. you re talking about a whole different you are talking about all fake news. george woke up in pain.
that this is going to die down is not going to happen. because they do have an incoming adam schiff as the house intel chairman that has already signaled this is going to be a focus of him russia regardless of the mueller investigation turns out. i don t think that s going away. however, do i think that the talking point and the focus that there needs to be some sort of mueller protection bill now ridiculous. as giuliani pointed out 30 witnesses, 1.4 million pages of material. president trump has also answered these questions. tim what investigation needs to be protected? he is already a participant and has done everything can he to participate in this. however i m a little bit concerned that this is more of an investigation in search-of a crime. saying they don t see anything here. even peter strzok who hated trump said in his text messages he didn t want to be part of the special counsel investigation because he didn t think anything was there. julie: sean, now we have jeff sessi