confirmation judicial process than to offer my opinion to my own boss, who was not a member of the judiciary committee and didn t need anyone s advice to making his decision to volt against clarence thomas. the senators who were not on that committee watched on tv the spectacle as it unfolded and the seemingly relentless attempts by united states senators to find new ways to humiliate themselves. now, let me just people hearing yesterday s testimony are probably wondering how could this client, you know, retired woman know about something like long don silver.
detail and you should, there s the masterful book strange justice. i was work in the senate then but had no role in the confirmation judicial process than to offer my opinion to my own boss, who was not a member of the judiciary committee and didn t need anyone s advice to making his decision to volt against clarence thomas. the senators who were not on that committee watched on tv the spectacle as it unfolded and the seemingly relentless attempts by united states senators to find new ways to humiliate themselves. now, let me just people hearing yesterday s testimony are probably wondering how could this client, you know, retired
but it doesn t give you a court seat. it may be that many in the hearings on monday can t decide who is telling the truth. that s okay, you don t have to decide who is telling the truth, but if that means you don t know if your supreme court nominee is telling the truth, how can you then support that nominee? yes, but, and i think buzz of the ha#metoo movement, everyone knows someone who has been in that situation. tomorrow s last word is next. big jim, he s got you covered great big jim, there ain t no other -so, this is covered, right? -yes, ma am. take care of it for you right now. giddyup!
that we have testimony under oath with a lot of questions asked of both of them. so she s just set out the terms of her vote. if she doesn t believe judge kavanaugh, then he s got two problems in front of her. one, his conduct as a 17-year-old, but most importantly, his conduct as a nominee lying in the confirmation process. i think it s really clear this is not a court of law, right? this doesn t need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. multiple people have said on the airwaves today, and i completely agree, that this is about suspicion and this is about character, and no one is entitled to a supreme court seat. you know, if you commit sexual misconductor a or are accused o even when you re younger, it doesn t mean you can t have a position in society or redeem yourself.
one, his conduct as a 17-year-old, but most importantly, his conduct as a nominee lying in the confirmation process. i think it s really clear this is not a court of law, right? this doesn t need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. multiple people have said on the airwaves today, and i completely agree, that this is about suspicion and this is about character, and no one is entitled to a supreme court seat. you know, if you commit sexual misconduct or are accused of it even when you re younger, it doesn t mean you can t have a position in society or redeem yourself. but it doesn t give you a court seat. it may be that many in the hearings on monday can t decide who is telling the truth. that s okay, you don t have to decide who is telling the truth, but if that means you don t know if your supreme court nominee is telling the truth, how can you