Venugopal, 91, who argued in favour of the NJAC, said that the real problem is that “if an amendment affects the judiciary, then the decision will be very very subjective.”
SUBJECT WISE INDEXAccess to JusticeFundamental right of Access to Justice - Abolition of OAT does not violate right of access to justice as cases will be heard by High Court - The fundamental right of.
SUBJECT WISE INDEXBailEnsure basic essentials such as FIR number, police station are recorded in bail orders: Supreme Court to all High Courts. Ravish Kumar v. State of Bihar, 2023 LiveLaw (SC).
The bench also pointed out that 22 names (for the appointment as judges) were returned by the Centre recently, and some of those names were earlier reiterated by the collegium. 📰 Names of 44 Judges To Be Confirmed Within Three Days: Centre Assures Supreme Court Amid Row Over Delay in Appointments.