The whole world as well you mentioned the wall what exactly has happened to beverly arms christians i understand 86 percent. Of christians of have left the wall is being blamed for that as well as illegal knew or could patients around bethlehem when we talk about the christian presence in palestine and in general and the christian presence in bethlehem in particular the political situation since the 1967 enhanced and then forced and encouraged the degrees of the christian presence and migration of christians from bethlehem in specific many of the christian bethlehem ites before 967 immigrated seeking the Job Opportunities seeking better conditions other parts of the world including latin america the u. S. The moment israel. Its consensus all who were not inside lost their national id number thus. The continuing political factors coming from the 1st intifada the 2nd intifada and the war mainly the war encouraged many of the Young Palestinian families to immigrate so we are talking about
Available for that they were going to take away the kind of privilege of his wealth they were even fighting its goal is the whole background that really matters the easy thing for them to do is to implement boundary changes weve been to have a new commission to make the seats even even smaller in areas that labor could do better in i mean thats thats probably on the cards but he may be thinking of other things he may be thinking of changing the Voting System so you have to go through various stages of id to actually be able to vote and that would harm labor in particular ways its perhaps the party for him and for the people who backed him in the people who gave the money for his campaign they never want to see the fret of a social Democratic Left wing labor party again john. Famously the Bullingdon Club reputedly used to send their Members Around oxford to burning a 50 pound note. In front of the homeless is that what britain is seriously looking forward to that kind of future i think
The vote expected later today the president himself accused the democratic leadership of pressuring Party Members to vote a certain way and that they do sound bites emerging from the house floor already. This is a moment that you will read about in your history books he sought to elevate himself as a dictator a king but we are not him arent monarchy we are the United States of america i want my daughter to be able to tell her children grandma did the right thing because in america no one is above the law now one of the democrat witnesses not one was able to establish that the president committed bribery treason or high crimes and misdemeanors tench taken Office Nearly 3 years ago President Trump has consistently and intentionally divided this country when the president withheld military aid to vulnerable nuke ukraine he sought to sabotage our elections after all the drama the majority is not found a single shred of evidence only 2nd 3rd 4th hand information i cant stop thinking about t
Off common rules when we should see question a good excuse me is the partiality of regulators in my experience and television right through my career it doesnt matter what you call them the independent Broadcasting Authority independent Television Authority off home whatever. Their own power shall attain their own stablished on partiality is the is is an issue that is seldom address but isnt the point that the regulates it and certainly the law is that britains most biggest independent television station recognise that you personally are not an impartial journalist perhaps not so i dont know but the lawyers i know were perfectly happy with my film was combed by lawyers and and they did by and large very constructive job actually of of saying well that might be difficult to say that could be a liability issue there and so on and so theres nothing different about this documentary than previous documentaries into the sense that you still get the other side is close enough thats whats diff
Get to the issues in the film if you do interview those who favor the privatization of the n. H. S. In this in the break were not like youre doing a one sided yields as a journalist of course i dont do and i never do one side to job thats pointless journalism there is so much one sidedness in journalism and socalled mainstream journalism there is if you like a huge imbalance. In journalism. One looks at the b. B. C. Coverage of the last election for an example of that and so much else writes for the tabloids and their rather crude partisanship thats not journalism journalism is is taking is investigating something and then taking it to those responsible and saying what you have to say about this but not only that challenging them and having the knowledge to be able to talent challenge them not just blustering them. Blustering thats considered you know what to you come thats not thats not a challenge thats not journalism and thats what these programs to i hope thats what they set out to