Next item is item b. The oath. Would all persons that may be giving testimony today please stand and raise your righthand . [oath you may be seated. And have an announcement that item d, for a new appeal case number 6779, 3580 san bruno avenue has been withdrawn and this case will not be heard today. The next item, is c, approval of the minutes, discussion and possible action to adopt the minutes for the meeting held on may 15th, 2013. Is there a motion to approve in i move. Second. Are all in favor . Aye. Aye. Are any opposed in is there any Public Comment on approving the minutes . Seeing none, the minutes are approved. Next item is item e, continued appeal order of abatement. Case number 6778326330. The owner, brandon acase no. 6778 326330 presidio avenue owner of record and appellant brendan a. Quinlan, 63 wawona street, san francisco, ca 94127 owner of record and appellant elizabeth quinlan, 63 wawona street, san francisco, ca 94127 action requested by appellant the appellant is r
Thank you. Department rebuttal. As i initially stated, it says that it is up to the commission we will abide by what your decision is, and at this point, thank you. I actually have a question. Sure. Is it the departments position that the landlord is doing everything that he can to remedy this . The information that i have, i am not personally involved in this case but the information that i have is that yes, that the landlord is trying and you heard his testimony. The landlord is trying to resolve the issue. It is a matter of accessibility at this point and a relationship between the landlord and the Property Owner determines that over all resolving the problem. Commissioner walker . Yes, what is the approximate time needed to do the work on this violation, anybody . Okay. Thank you. Yes, commissioner. I already have obtained permit. Okay. And i already have most of the materials. And the subcontractors have been ready on a number of occasions to do the work and we would go to the bui
The city of San Francisco sfgtv meeting of the San Francisco Building Inspection Commission occurring august 21, 2013, will begin shortly. Good morning, today is wednesday, august 21, 2013, this is a meeting of the abatement appeals board, i would like to remine everyone to turn off all Electronic Devices and the first item on the agenda is roll call. President clinch . Here. Vice president melgar . Here. Commissioner mar . Here. Commissioner mccray is expected. Commissioner mccarthy . Here. And commissioner lee . Here. Commissioner walker . Here of the we have a quorum and the next item is item b. The oath. Would all persons that may be giving testimony today please stand and raise your righthand . [oath you may be seated. And have an announcement that item d, for a new appeal case number 6779, 3580 san bruno avenue has been withdrawn and this case will not be heard today. The next item, is c, approval of the minutes, discussion and possible action to adopt the minutes for the meeting
That makes this announcement more exciting. Anchor has been a part of San Francisco and potrero hill for decades. Its a Great Partnership to have have it here in pier 78 pier 48, you are welcome. You sense the competition, maybe just on my part, i dont know. Nonetheless its very fortuitous that we are here today. I want to say thank you to keith gregor, and for the giants, larry, thank you for your leadership. And mayor, go giants. All right, thank you. Arent they great . Thank you, supervisors to be here and huddle together to stay warm. And lastly i want to introduce the president of the Port Commission, maureen woo ho. Join me in welcoming president woo ho. Good morning, and since i am standing here before your tasting, i wont be here long. I have been on the Port Commission for two years. And i want to acknowledge that i had fellow commissioners working on this project in this part of San Francisco. And in 20006 2006 there was effort of the port and the community and with the Mayor
But other prompts may be. That would definitely be something to be looked at. That would be great and maybe we could get together proposals around that. I think that it is a benefit. To have these buildings available. There are some of our lowest cost housing. But they really need to, we need to continue to focus on bringing the ha bitbility up. And the bliet cases that are very difficult cases for us to resolve so if that became available in the future it would be most helpful. As i remember it, the old programs, the surf program was funded by dbi and it was something that got. It was a Commission Action that dedicated that money to Single Family home owners. So it did not have to be that way. But we change that had three years ago when it was taken out of the code. Because the funds had dried up. But as i remember, it also the fund was made available because of individual actions of the inspecters that you have to file something with the state in order to get the money back from the