The post, we understand that successfully navigating this tension is vital to protecting a vibrant prepress. Just last week i worked on the stories about a hate crime, actually about the aftermath of some appalling graffiti spray painted at a high school, so we can decide just how much of the offensive language we should repeat in telling the story in the text, photographs and video. Courts and commentators alike are grappling with critical questions, how do we determine the difference between artistic expression and a true threat. There is a line between First Amendment protective journalism and the governments interest in defending its desire to keep some things, perhaps too many things, secret. And how can we maintain a free and open exchange of ideas online, while also ensuring safety and security. Today we are fortunate to be joined by some of the most popular and powerful voices in this debate. Please welcome senator ted cruz to the Washington Post live stage this afternoon, he w
Apply those clauses. Congress shall make no law, im sure all of you can fill in the rest. We celebrate free speech, even as we reckon with the discomforts and danger that words sometimes inflict here at the post, we understand that successfully navigating this tension is vital to protecting a vibrant prepress. Just last week i worked on the stories about a hate crime, actually about the aftermath of some appalling graffiti spray painted at a high school, so we can decide just how much of the offensive language we should repeat in telling the story in the text, photographs and video. Courts and commentators alike are grappling with critical questions, how do we determine the difference between artistic expression and a true threat. There is a line between First Amendment protective journalism and the governments interest in defending its desire to keep some things, perhaps too many things, secret. And how can we maintain a free and open exchange of ideas online, while also ensuring safe
Reader and for obvious reasons, i feel very passionate about history, i think we need to be able to look through the lens of history at times that are similar to the times we are living in. We need to learn about people in our country who can be models for us all. History is obviously important, but i believe it has to be accessible way without dumbing it down or without lowering the standards for research or accuracy. So dont forget to read my source notes. I find source notes really grueling and so i always tell the audiences please read my source notes because i have spent so much time on them but in all seriousness, that is my quest. I want to entertain, but at the same time to deliver a very important story. And in order for me to get interested in the topic, it has to be really significant. It has to include things that i think will help us learn about ourselves and about our country. And another qualification for me is that it really has to be something that maybe has been swall
America. Were going to have more on that in our show as well. Thank you atas home for joining me this hour. Today we got the news tat Donald Trumps one criminal case, the one criminal case that was likely Toe Go To Trial Before E November Election may be delayed. Manhattan District Attorney alvin braggs Hush Money Case was set tos go to trial on mar 25th, less than two weeks from today, but now that date is in question. Now,s trumps legal strategy i all his cases has been to push them off as long as possible, preferably to the month of neb ruary. Today d. A. s braggs off consented to another delay of the trial. The issue at hand is a new trove of records turned over by the feds in the Southern District of new york, Tens Of Thousands of records. Specifically 31,000 pages of records the u. S. Attorneys office just handed over to Braggs Office yesterday. Now, the d. A. Specifically pins this newest delay on trump, saying thaton trumps legal tea waited until two months ago to request this
If he really going to run for Supreme Court that theyre going to hear your case. Reelection . In two years . He doesnt have another they have the Supreme Court internal senate race to deal with. But we will see. Identified for the lawyers on both sides the question, and the only question, they want to hear addressed. And i want to give that question to the audience now. I wouldnt put any money on the question is whether, and if Mitch Mcconnells decency and so to what extent, does a integrity. Do you have any optimism, former president enjoy president ial immunity from im not asking who, but in terms of the leadership that criminal prosecution for comes next . Of course not. Conduct alleged to involve what i would say this. Official acts during his tenure i would say the only optimism, the only sign of optimism is in office . How would you address that that i think its likely that whoever comes next will be less question . Well, if im jack smith, the competent. Because Mitch Mcconnell i