rear yards. thank you. thank you. is there additional public comment on this item? commissioners, good afternoon. i got the i got something prepared but in light of the long day you had already, i ll be brief. the spur in the back is was owned by southern pacific transportation. the title is so clouded back there it was subject to litigation. no property taxes paid on that property right now. it has a lot number, subject to litigation. in my lifetime, i bleach nothing will be built or done with it because they can t define the true owners of the property. i would ask you to support the project, it has nine two bedrooms, 16 parking, comp temporary design. it is it is pipeline project in 24u7b6 2006. i ask you for the support. the rear of the property is so undesirable because people park their trucks and stuff back there. i ask you to support the rear yard modification. thank you for your time. additional public comment. closed. i would be inclined to agree wit
and dwelling unit exposure, we we both of these are relatively minor issues. we have a lot that is irregular inasmuch as it has this railroad spur this the back that provides a sort of diagonal rear lot line and cuts off the back of the property. we have every reason to believe this is going we have every reason to believe this is going to be the state for quite a while. it is difficult if not impossible property to develop behind us. many buildings are 100% lot coverage and many have property line windows right on that spur. so, for all intents and purposes the way we re look agate this is this is mid block open space that will be there for our residents as well as other residents for the foreseeable future. open space is not an issue. we have a large open space on the roof of the the structure, the two dwelling units that deegdepow mentioned down at grade on the sidewalk have internal access to the elevator and drew connection to the open space. we have common open spac
pulled back to meet the code and not have all of these exceptions on dwelling unit exposure and rear yards. thank you. thank you. is there additional public comment on this item? commissioners, good afternoon. i got the i got something prepared but in light of the long day you had already, i ll be brief. the spur in the back is was owned by southern pacific transportation. the title is so clouded back there it was subject to litigation. no property taxes paid on that property right now. it has a lot number, subject to litigation. in my lifetime, i bleach nothing will be built or done with it because they can t define the true owners of the property. i would ask you to support the project, it has nine two bedrooms, 16 parking, comp temporary design. it is it is pipeline project in 24u7b6 2006. i ask you for the support. the rear of the property is so undesirable because people park their trucks and stuff back there. i ask you to support the rear yard modification.
owned by southern pacific transportation. the title is so clouded back there it was subject to litigation. no property taxes paid on that property right now. it has a lot number, subject to litigation. in my lifetime, i bleach nothing will be built or done with it because they can t define the true owners of the property. i would ask you to support the project, it has nine two bedrooms, 16 parking, comp temporary design. it is it is pipeline project in 24u7b6 2006. i ask you for the support. the rear of the property is so undesirable because people park their trucks and stuff back there. i ask you to support the rear yard modification. thank you for your time. additional public comment. closed. i would be inclined to agree with project sponsor in looking a the the map and understanding that rare railroad area, i m not sure that s a rear yard space that will be ute hifed much because of the surrounding area and the pact it may it may be more desirable to be on the
is per petly open space has the developer and the owner of the adjacent property at 2660 had discussions about buying the railroad? the railroad spur? it is an inactive spur as far as i know. this level of the mission, pardon me this area of the mission was active in industrial use which is is why there were railroad spurs. this entire block is going to residential on the west side of harrison street. when you have two bedroom units, it is it isn t really a family housing, except for the one that that is sold as affordable units. if there s two, there s one that will be affordable. that will be a family housing unit because of the way most sell two bedroom units. but two bedroom units are are often a bedroom and a office. we have a continuing problem with people saying, well, we re going to provide generous rooftop open space. we we re we re going to a place where we are assuming people are going to change the way they live to be different from the way it is. ro