creates privacy problems for some neighbors. and it is generally not as well used as as levels that are at the ground or accessible to the unit because it is gold up there. so i request that you support the staff recommendation and require the building to be pulled back to meet the code and not have all of these exceptions on dwelling unit exposure and rear yards. thank you. thank you. is there additional public comment on this item? commissioners, good afternoon. i got the i got something prepared but in light of the long day you had already, i ll be brief. the spur in the back is was owned by southern pacific transportation. the title is so clouded back there it was subject to litigation. no property taxes paid on that property right now. it has a lot number, subject to litigation. in my lifetime, i bleach nothing will be built or done with it because they can t define the true owners of the property. i would ask you to support the project, it has nine two bedroom