Consider the post earthquake. We have an unfortunate loss of water pressure after an earthquake. The local jurisdiction are a little bit concerned about over reliance on sprinklers instead of fixed assets because of lost water. My main Fire Protection engineer, hes concerned and wants to implement if you have a tank in your building, you have the water supply, sprinkler system. They have to have some back up water already high rises need them. Except, its supposed to be 30 minutes for your most demands thats a lot of water. The minimum is 15,000 gallons. I think 25,000 was the last one i saw they were proposing. Its a pretty good size. All around San Francisco we see cisterns as well for water supply. Theres no one within sight here. But you can tell because right in the middle of an intersection, you see that. Thats a symbol for an under ground system. We have a lot of them. We can draft out of those. We can put our solid hoses in there and actually suck some water out and put some pr
1, 2009. And it relies on fire sprinklers. Can you think of any . Existing building, if people try to implement it. They may have to sprinkler their buildings. You can built the building bigger or more area. Or bring your separation a little closer together. Theres a lot of advantages to the designer. And i think we may see some of these buildings putting them in they they dont have to get the advantages. Particularly the ones downtown. You try to put the sprinklers in and they get to take advantage of the code. The new code doesnt consider the post earthquake. We have an unfortunate loss of water pressure after an earthquake. The local jurisdiction are a little bit concerned about over reliance on sprinklers instead of fixed assets because of lost water. My main Fire Protection engineer, hes concerned and wants to implement if you have a tank in your building, you have the water supply, sprinkler system. They have to have some back up water already high rises need them. Except, its su
You know, my organization, take a try at it. But you know, in all honesty, i dont know if we will be able to meet whatever the financial obligations are of the programming and then, if there is resources, to help to meet that standard but i do want to make sure, that we keep in mind, the importance, you know, of that center, and of the existence of leads and some of the reasons why, you know, in the organizations like leads, and may not have made it, but the importance of the education, and of the neighborhood, and making sure that information for this jewel is transferred throughout the community and i dont know, if that is sort of garbl. Ed but i have to say something. And because i think that this is a great opportunity, for you know, the organization and i just dont want it to not be an organization, that is not connected to the community. Thank you. Thank you. Further Public Comment . Hi, my name is Wendy Brummer and i am currently on the board of ledge and first of all i want to
Secondly primarily with the safety issue just like others of our neighbors we talk to have had people into their back yards, uninviteded guest at the retaining wall and also issues with trash being thrown over the fence, over the wall on a fairly regular basis. It just think there is a legitimate security issue and legitimate reason to have a fence. I guess from the current granting of the variance, the view has substantially been restored as the Property Owners have pointed out you can really now see all the way down to the roof tops of their home from the sidewalk. I think it really addresses that issue. So, i felt that the variance granted was quite reasonable. Thats all i have to say. Is there any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Mr. Woois, we have rebuttal time. Three minutes. 3 minutes. Things have changed. The first thing i would like to mention is i have been as Everybody Knows more or less the driving force. Im not shamed of that. In fact it i
Thank you. My name is pam [speaker not understood]. Im the president , board chair of the Chinese Progressive Association and i want to be able to speak in support of campos supervisor campos legislation. I want to be able to speak in terms of the Community Perspective and as community, people always have access to expressing their views when we have our elected board of trustees. And now we dont have that kind of access any more. And we have a lot to say. And some of the things that we really care about in preserving, not only in terms of the credit classes ill go back to that in just a moment. But the value of city college to be able to provide education and services that fall under the category of noncredit classes. And im very concerned that our ability to be able to communicate, the richness and importance of these kinds of courses will be denied us and we will lose them. The second party want to as a Community Representative to speak of is of the access, Affordable Access and acc