Be mitigated through certain measures. The project will ultimately result if in an overall reduction of emissions because of the Clean Technology of the new generators. The project is applicable to the site as the departments materials show the project essentialists the criteria for conditional use authorization including the other criteria. The policy is in code with the commerce and industry and Community Safety element to the plan. It will not have a Significant Impact on the environment. In connection with the safety element i want to emphasis that having redundancy those generators will help to insure with the City Infrastructure remains operable following an emergency. Quite a few of the of the facilities have the serves. Therefore i ask you to granlt the use of the authorization in that regard, i. Asking for one small change. The actual generators and some of the infrastructure will be installed over a 12 year period and we would like the conditions of approvals clarified to state we can continue to install the generators so long as we pull the site permit and within the 3 year time period. This is intended to help us out if five or six years Small Business asks us if well knighthood with the conditions opening it up for Public Comment. I have one speaker card. John good afternoon thank you very much for seeing me today. Im an engineering manager for t mobile and im responsible for the area of my expertise is the power and space. Weve been attending paul avenue over 10 years. The Wireless Industry has been a fast growing destroy and on 200 paul avenue weve grown organic storefronts and grown through accusations we want to update this to a more reliable through redundancy to switching over to 2 hundred paul. I hope that you will support us and look forward to working here in San Francisco area Going Forward and im available for questions and any additional Public Comment . Michael San Francisco public and trades council. I know youve seen the letter ive sent but those machines you have sitting in front of you those have relied on 2 hundred paul and the shortening the cable between those facilities and the machines is critical to insuring there are fewer possibilities of the signals you all were depending upon on. We might all one of those days hope theres an alternative for diesel such 2 hundred paul but right now thats not the case its diesel and thats why in hospitals its an emergency back up as well. We could look at fuel cells one day but theyre not there thank you. Good afternoon. Im the kenst im the chief Financial Office i believe you have a letter from me in our packet. Im here to commend the project sponsor with their engagement in the community. Clearly everybody does get what they want but theyve gone beyond the preliminaries the department was putting before them and quite honestly do a great process. Didnt walk away when we could have and this is to be commended and this is an example of how project sponsors do it right. I also want to commend heidi kline and jessica who come out to the bay view and a met with a lot of the people to explain the environmental process and raise the education level base for a lot of us being not educated in this the phrase accommodate active impact means this is going to have a huge impact on things not secret. So a great deal of effort was put in by the department to help the community understand. I do want to call out from the memory of understanding something steve doesnt mention. It calls for continuing engagement both in working with the community on the jobs area and exposing members of the community to opportunity in the future. And this is key to our needs and then their commitment to go beyond the requirements to tell you a reduction in pollution from the site and this a pollution hot spot of the city as you know from reading the environmental report. So im here to ask our support for the project any additional Public Comment . Okay seeing none, Public Comment is closed commissioner anton all we often have conditional uses on projects that is a project that truly is necessary and desirable for many of the reasons already stated and, you know, the fact that its actually putting in filters and its go back net zero or less than net zero is going to be an improvement. 3450i7bd its only 8 generators are tested once a month and usage is around 14 hours per year there will be less noise arrest the cable length from the transmission from the actual user to the back up site has to be fairly close you cant locate it 10 or many miles away. In fact, they have another site right across the new project next to infinity next to folsom so its for those be located, you know, close to where their customers are but this is particularly good its close to the source of pg e. And if you go up the peninsula youll notice the grounded wires are next to the airport and you want to be as cross to those because the diesel will be reinstate on some power. The very fact theyre the back up they have to rely on them. Its good this is public works dr 2 its a Company Located in San Francisco and it serves as the Emergency Services where much of the information that comes into San Francisco were the first source from the Many Companies and its essentially this information be able to be abbreviate 3 hundred and 65 days a year so im supportive it is good im glad to hear theres not as much objection this seems to be containing all the answers. Perhaps the City Attorney should talk about the suggested changes and the motions and the conditions the motions are the same but the conditions might change. The sponsor is asking for the conditions that might lead to the authorization be clarified or added to slightly. Right now it basically says you commence the project within full permits to commence the project within 3 years then it remains valid so the permits are 3 years but theyll still be valid theyre trying to make it clear that the installation of generators morning 3 years would be okay then the commencement of the industry is like the new generators would automately be updated after 12 years it will still be the old ones from 2013. That both be a different kind of condition. I believe what was authorizations under the mitigated desk for the generators if i wanted to apply another condition that would be another condition i dont know if we need to condition it because they require permits from back pedestrian so they will get a new permit and that will insure with the most appropriate equipment is in place. I have the idea that be cuttingedge at all times i want to raises the question so we at least have an understanding that we remain cuttingedge as the technology changes. Im in support of the project and move to approve commissioner. Yes. Do you have a suggested language change in condition 3 or are we just invoicing here as an intent. The sponsor has requested the change we dont have any suggested language but if the Commission Wants to make that change go ahead. Its the commissions intention to support the sponsor. We can draft that with the commissions pd it will allow up to 12 years to install the back up generators but they still have to get the permit that will be allotted up to 12 years and in addition to the corrections that were noted during his presentation as well. Is that thats okay with the maker of the motion. Gentlemen absolutely. And the secondary as well. Commissioners theres a motion a second to approve the conditions and all the time it by the commissioner. On that motion calling names so moved commissioners that places you on item 12 for case 20110 z also known as pennsylvania avenue requester to an authorization good afternoon president fong corey. The project is a large project authorization to demolish the two believes and put up another believe. It will be 44 feet tall and have the vehicle Parking Spaces in a ground floor parking garage. It will be 40 stories for the other location and will have 8 vehicle Parking Spaces in a ground floor parking garbage. They have inner courtyards in the rear and there will contain sidewalks. This includes expectations for the composure planning code, however, the current proposal optional requires is rear yard proposal and thats reflected in our package. Its along 17 and pennsylvania avenue are to provide 10 foot set back and being slightly raised to provide the transmission space for the dwellings. The building on 171 has a lot area thats covered but the building. Please note that the rear yard is only 2 thousand and 75 square feet but thats only for the open Space Component of the rear yard. The building on 140 pennsylvania avenue represents 25 percent of the lot area covered by the building. They have a second story courtyard, however, its to be provided for a dwelling unit. It provides ground floor units on 17 street and pennsylvania avenue. The rear yard is to be open 25 percent of the lot and it includes Building Spaces 25 percent of the lot. Therefore it requires an exception section 134 to allow the rear yard to gun at the second story instead of the ground floor. Its requested both building meet the composure developments of the planning code. The project is going to provide on site affordable units and its a tier site within zoning district. And as such the project will provide 5 on site opt. Please note that the draft notation references there are to be corrected in the final notation. The department received two calls of general inquiry about the project and one letter of opposition. In order for the construction that believe approved it must have an exception to the rear yard. And prudent to planning codes f and 329. The Department Recommendation the project be approved and it will add 5 affordable units that be transitioning toward more opts. The ground floors will be near pennsylvania avenue and otherwise actuate those uncles. It currently lacks streetscape features and the promise proposes a high quality design that is consistent with the design code and the general plan overall. That concludes my presentation project sponsor, please. Good afternoon, commissioners im kidnap im with valleytion. I have a power point presentation im loading up right now. Sow theres kind of a running joke in the Development Community in San Francisco that can take a a lot of time to see a project to fruition and this is the poster child of that statement. Just to give you an idea background of the project it was first submitted in the year 2000 clinton was pointing and willie brown was mayor and i couldnt legally drink alcohol. It was submitted in the beginning as a big 5 story commercial building at 68 thousand square feet and had 68 thousand parker spaces and the desk was given in november 17th of 2000 but, of course, since 13 then e then there was the. Com bubble and 911 happened to the project was on hold. So 2378 in 2005 it was resubmitted this time as a two building residential with 48 units and it was 52 thousand square feet 5 stories and zero bicycle spaces and the final negative desk was issued in 2005. But, of course, right now right after that in february 2006 had a moratorium so the project was again on hold. And in 2008 we had an economic meltdown. Finally in 2009 the eastern neighborhood zoning passed and although that happened this project was slated as a tyrone type two pipeline project that was grandfathered in for a previous status which had a 55 feet he heightened limit but despite that the project sponsor revised it under the new eastern neighborhoods plan. So what you get is what we have today and thats 2 residential buildings with 4 studios and 15 two beds and its only 45 thousand square feet and has 39 class one bike spaces. The affordability is up 14. 4 percent and the owner the project sponsor is going to be paying impact fees. This is just to give you an idea of the general area. The layers point doesnt work on the tv. This the adjacent to a 280 and next to the uc sf compass theres a lot of new development to the north and southeast as well. Its to give you an idea of the type employment that will be coming into this area that will be crying for new residential area. This is just a general idea that you see right now at the site the upper image shows a lot of the by a person to the building you can see across the Development Poster of 2000 of all the medical stuff kaiser is going to be building there. The picture on the bottom shows the adjacent to the railroad and one thing you notice theres a ton of windows it on the Property Line of the adjacent building and this was something we felt was a design challenge to accommodate to be a good neighbor. Heres again, just around the site. You can see the Railroad Studios just on the top and just to the right of that it is new big multiple Family Development as well. And to the south you can see the context it is in 280 which will be potentially lowered in the future. Heres what were proposing. As you can see multiple Family Residential with the ground floor is residential as well but fitting in with the ground floor residential plan their set back and one thing you notice is the clean up area around the Railroad Tracks for parking and landscape and the project donor helped that to happen. Its 37 units there are 152 bedrooms and the total space is 25 thousand 350. And this design weve actually got 40 percent over the required open space. And, of course, were going to meet the b m rs that we talked about. Theres going to be 2, two bedrooms and one studio. And again before we had no Parking Spaces now there will be over oneonone ratio of class one bike Parking Spaces. This is the context youll see on the existing building 1 thing is 17th street deadends its not a viable pedestrian area for commercial because theres no thoroughfare people are by passing this altogether. Its landlocked thats why we felt with that and the influx of believes for employment theres a big need for residential. Heres the building as were proposing the thing youll notice is the ground floor is set back as we mentioned. Its also not any higher than the railroad lost building it actually meets the top of the building as it comes down and a fits in nicely. This is a rendering to give you an idea of one of the porches. Youll notice the trains in this ground floor. Heres the entry on 17th street into the main lobby. This is the entry on pennsylvania avenue as well. This is the existing site plan as you see today. The building just to the northwest of our building is the garden building and just to the north well i wont say north technically west its adjacent to us and thats the wall of all the windows on the Property Line i mentioned earlier. So this is our proposed site plan. You can see we tried to accommodate those windows so none of those windows will be blocked and were meeting the open space of the garden area with our building to the left in the image. Heres the ground floor plan. As youll see the step back on the parking. One thing all the bicycle are assessable to the lobbies and to the entrance and exits of the building. This is the open spates it shows you the podium level courtyard pa has our rear yard it will be mostly green and pretty open. You can see on this one we stepped down down to 40 feet the new zoning requires a 40 foet foot set back so we go from 40 to 48. The vertical is what youre seeing is to try to mimic thank you, sir your time it up. Any Public Comment open this item. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Opening it up to commissioners. I have some
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.