Very difficult time for the former agency. Both local 21 and seiu have been in difficult discussions with the city and county of San Francisco and ocii. The good news is that in november proposition d passed. And that granted former redevelopment employees city benefits and the majority of voters in San Francisco supported that, so this is kind of representing a turning point in Union Management and relations, and its given clarification to all of the uncertainty created by the state when they eliminated redevelopment so were working with the city and county on a transition of employment for our members who want to continue to work on redevelopment projects but as employees of the city and not ocii employees. However, under prop d that transition must take place before march 1 and that means we need to have settlements with ocii and with the city and county of San Francisco as soon as possible, the real deadlines here that are critical so the union anticipates u. S. Commissioners do no
Okay. Good afternoon. I am with local 21. I am try to keep this brief. Im the union rep for project managers, housing specialists, contract compliance officers, engineers, all the folks you see before you who help make these redevelopment projects possible, and as you know since 2012 its been a very difficult time for the former agency. Both local 21 and seiu have been in difficult discussions with the city and county of San Francisco and ocii. The good news is that in november proposition d passed. And that granted former redevelopment employees city benefits and the majority of voters in San Francisco supported that, so this is kind of representing a turning point in Union Management and relations, and its given clarification to all of the uncertainty created by the state when they eliminated redevelopment so were working with the city and county on a transition of employment for our members who want to continue to work on redevelopment projects but as employees of the city and not o
Francisco must take care of the individuals. Thats why that bridge willie brown is there. San francisco had the investment to really make sure that this city is really what america is supposed to be. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker cards. No theyre deferred. They didnt waive. Okay. Good afternoon. I am with local 21. I am try to keep this brief. Im the union rep for project managers, housing specialists, contract compliance officers, engineers, all the folks you see before you who help make these redevelopment projects possible, and as you know since 2012 its been a very difficult time for the former agency. Both local 21 and seiu have been in difficult discussions with the city and county of San Francisco and ocii. The good news is that in november proposition d passed. And that granted former redevelopment employees city benefits and the majority of voters in San Francisco supported that, so this is kind of representing a turning point in Union Management and relations, and its gi
Have heard, but i havent seen anything come through yet. Yeah, the chase is already there. Okay. Thank you very much. Are there any questions or comments . I just have a comment. The color is very nice. You need more of it. Yes we do. I would say that general comment as well. Thats a great design. Its challenging to properly mask something of this type of use on that block, and i think its a great use of space for the most part. I think really good job, everybody. Any other comments, questions . Commissioner mondejar . A question for staff. You have all these conditions of approval, so, are you still going to come back to us after all of these conditions are met or are you just going through for the staff is going to recommend all of these . For conditions we typically have conditions on. There is also some if iness of building. If we change anything to the significance of the design we would come back to you for approval. The intention is to if iness what you approve today. Effect the
This is because we dont receive taxes from ucsf. And unfortunately we have a significant amount of work that we need to do, whether it be infrastructure at mission bay, whether it be Transportation Needs at mission bay, whether it be housing in mission bay and i do realize there are limits to where this funding can go. But i just think that they should be paying the entire amount up froth or paying the entire amount over the duration of the 30 years. I dont see why it should be discounted because the city is not collecting property taxes in any other instance from ucsf and in this particular case our one shot, our one chance at collecting some level of significant revenue is basically turned into a deal. I think they should pay the full amount and thats the reason why because there are no guarantees that theyll move out of the space. And the fact that thats even introduced in any way to make an argument is just i dont support that argument because we cant force them to do that. I think