last week that the review board contacted walter sheridan who was the right-hand man for robert kennedy and they wanted his records. him he worked with bobby kennedy when he was with the department of justice, he did some secret investigation after the assassination. his records were up at the jfk library as soon as he was asked for these records he went up to the jfk library and grabbed them, delivered them to nbc in new york. he had been hired by nbc in the late 60s to monitor the gym garrison trial which was the impetus for the jfk movie and nbc took possession of those records and refused to give them. to show you the level of destruction in our government, the review board prepared a subpoena to serve on nbc and they refused, the department of justice refused to serve it.
the review board contacted walter sheridan, who was the right hand man for robert kennedy, and they wanted his records. he worked with bobby kennedy when bobby kennedy was department of justice. he also did some secret investigation by bobby after the assassination. his records were up at the jfk library. as soon as he was asked for these records, he went up to jfk library, grabbed them, delivered them to nbc in new york . and he had he had been hired by nbc in the late 60s to monitor the jim garrison trial. which was the impetus for the jfk movie and nbc took possession of those records and refused to disclose give them to the arb and to show you the level of obstruction in our government. the arb, the review board, prepare to subpoena, to serve on , to serve on the nbc and they refused to the department of justice, refused to serve it. that s just it s all beyond
is there any significance to the timing of this being released by a president who has been, to say the least, at odds with the intelligence community? not per se. i mean back when oliver stone made his jfk movie in the early 90s congress didn t want to grapple with this release issue so they booted it 25 years later and lo and behold it s today. trump had a decision open or close. for him, he s kind of at war with the cia and fbi so he doesn t want to hear their internal complaints about embarrassing information. it won t bother president trump any. he went to the side that s going to i think appeal to his base, which is release. why would it be embarrassing? just hypothetically speaking for the intelligence community? well, one thing i do thing for a living, meaning i ve read a lot of cia and fbi files, and you re amazed what keystone cops they often are, misspellings of names, wrong locations, bad
i think that takes away some of the strength. as many times as she steps before congress, she s going to testify again but she was strong when she testified previously at the end of her tenure as secretary of state. so i think that all of the things coming to light, all of the information that we have now, it s been debunked and debunked and debunked and debunked. how many more times do we have to debunk this as a conspiracy, as the republicans have laid it out? unfortunately, i ve spent years watching movies full of nonsense like the jfk movie, oliver stone, somehow this idiot, crazy man jim garrison was telling the truth, the new orleans d.a. it wasn t true at all. nixon had nothing to do with killing kennedy. johnson had nothing to do with it. yet a lot of kids come out of that movie theater with baseball caps on saying did you know nixon was involved in killing kennedy and so was johnson involved apparently. people do buy what they say at the movies. google wasn t as prevalent
2012 may be able to get them angry enough to come back out no matter who your nominee ends up being. if you can keep the anger on that side over benghazi high, that is there s a much higher likelihood you re going to get those people to go out even if you get a moderate republican in the end. i just don t think this issue has potency any more politically because of the fact they ve admitted multiple times this is politically motivated. i think that takes away some of the strength. as many times as she steps before congress, she s going to testify again but she was strong when she testified previously at the end of her tenure as secretary of state. so i think that all of the things coming to light, all of the information that we have now, it s been debunked and debunked and debunked and debunked. how many more times do we have to debunk this as a korns, as the republicans have laid it out? unfortunately, i ve spent years watching movies full of nonsense like the jfk movie, oliver