charges? could it go to a higher court? he is kicking it. i mean, look. what is going to happen is that the jury is going to get these remaining counts. three of them carry the death penalty, one is the 40-year-old immigrant that was killed and the defense claims that was an accident. what the defense is going to try to do is argue the case. say the d.a. didn t prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. perhaps save his life get a determinative sentence and life without parole. bob: best thing that could happen life without parole. they are not going to let this guy go. kimberly: i hope they don t. evidence is more sufficient. you have eyewitness testimony babies alive on the counter for more than 20 minutes. the judge dismissed. committed by linda williams who pled guilty to the charge. the judge dismissed that charge. greg: do you know what this is about though? it s about bad timing. it sucks to be born at an inconvenient time. it s a fact already born are deciding on people who ar
i don t know if this judge jeffrey meinhardt is lazy or scared. typically judges right decisions on this type of thing and write decisions for presidential reasons so people can look at precedent how people can judge it what people can do and can t do. i think this is such a high profile case. why wouldn t this judge write a decision on it? also you are saying why wouldn t the judge let it go to the jury? because he admits several of dismissed several of these counts on motion to dismiss by defense attorney saying insufficiency of the evidence. i heard that testimony in the courtroom and there was eyewitness said i heard the baby crying going for air, having respiratory why wouldn t you let that go to a jury? bob: can i ask your co-counsel here, mr. gutfeld? kimberly: mr. gutfeld. bob: did you know judges could throw out things that people have been indicted for? i didn t know that did you know that? kimberly: yes. it s a huge problem. greg: if i can figure this out, the
surprised that the judge did. this then we were examining perhaps some kind of evidence, some kind of witnesses to it be presented during the defense case. the defense attorney jack mcmahon rested didn t call dr. gosnell which i said he wouldn t. cross-examination. he couldn t get experts to testify on his client s behalf. what s his high water mark. what does the defense have to do prove that there is at least a questionable doubt whether or not any of the babies were actually born with a heart beat? is that what he is looking for? with respect to the count of the babies to say that there is reasonable doubt as to whether or not the babies were born alive. so he he is going to from when i was in the courtroom with the medical examiner on the stand. he kept hammering the medical examiner saying you cannot say to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that those babies were born alive. you can t say it about baby a and b went through all of
alive which kind of explains the judge. we know how complicated abortion is is. what is amazing to me how planned parenthood calls this women s health. it s like droning people is called bad weather or raising taxes. this is called revenue growth. the clue is whenever the hard left calls he it something else, and they are resorting or wellian speak, it s because they are trying to mask moral bankruptcy. it s because they are evil. i m talking about those people. not you. eric: interesting that president obama was actually scheduled to headline the planned parenthood fundraiser happen tomorrow and he has now pushed it off to meeting with planned parenthood on friday. it s an interesting timing of events. greg: first thing he should do when he he gets up there is thank his mother. kimberly: the other charges that remain, four other charges that remain, if he is convicted, i would expect there is going to be a lot of appeals happening. so do you think that this judge is scared? you
them. they were not viable. they did not take a breath, by the way that is not an appropriate legal way to even, you know, kill a baby. these aren t abortions. these were done outside this isn t the right way. the women were drugged, the babies were drugged. bob: can you imagine going home and explaining to your family why out there being a defense witness for this guy? that s a big part of it it. who in their right mind would. they will be cross-examined because some of the other testimony in the grand jury was that these babies felt tremendous pain which this was being done with them with the scissors in the back. sning. the judge really is. i mean he is really mucked this up. first, didn t he make an error dropping the charge against baby c? wasn t there testimony that the baby was alive outside of the womb? this is buffaloing.