Cooking class, culinary skills. We have people in the community that could utilize the building for the citizens of San Francisco and for the fillmore. Give the people who live there a chance. You spend all this money and aint nobody benefiting in the community, nobody. Check it out. Thats all you have to do is check it out. This is the last opportunity the community has to blossom and do something with the remaining businesses that are there so thank you for listening. Thank you. Michael fisher. I just want to reiterate what has been said. I am also a member of the media group. This is my first time doing this. I feel good about it but yeah its important. We really need your help right now. We are on our last leg. We also want to we would like to set a new legacy here in San Francisco which is to be somebody, you know, to try to keep these kids off the streets. Kids are being murdered. I have a program and people behaving like that [inaudible] and my program is interview people such a
Cards. No theyre deferred. They didnt waive. Okay. Good afternoon. I am with local 21. I am try to keep this brief. Im the union rep for project managers, housing specialists, contract compliance officers, engineers, all the folks you see before you who help make these redevelopment projects possible, and as you know since 2012 its been a very difficult time for the former agency. Both local 21 and seiu have been in difficult discussions with the city and county of San Francisco and ocii. The good news is that in november proposition d passed. And that granted former redevelopment employees city benefits and the majority of voters in San Francisco supported that, so this is kind of representing a turning point in Union Management and relations, and its given clarification to all of the uncertainty created by the state when they eliminated redevelopment so were working with the city and county on a transition of employment for our members who want to continue to work on redevelopment pr
Informational memorandum. My recollection and my understanding was those dollars were approved by this commission and expended. It doesnt quite help the private property issue, but the past or of the church has raised as well as dr. Jackson there are certain private property functional issues about the building meeting the street grade. We have a limited ability to post a solution if we have not entered into a contract unless there is an area with tax for bond increase. We are unable to enter into an agreement to make further improvement but nonetheless we can follow up with an informational memorandum. Part of the commissions charge was to, all right if we cant help, what can we do, so we have worked closely and also the department of public works has reviewed an issue to see what can be done on the public side as the citys side own Public Improvement Program but there may be other improvements that the church owner itself may have to do but we can get the current people together. May
Scope. With that, our Deputy Director of Financing Administration will walk you with specifics on this item and dpw is also here. Thank you. Im leo levinson. What you have before you today is the first of what will be several different items in future meetings as well to be able to expend these unexpended bond proceeds from areas that we were not able to complut complete as dr. Bow he mentioned. This was one of the benefits of receiving that finance as completion as they may now allows us to use these old bond proceeds. These were in our budget and we can come forth with the actual memorandum of understanding with the department of public works to department of public works to expend the funds. This is 1 piece of it. There have been extensive discussions with the department and agreement that was appropriate for the 75,000 to supplement many other funding exchanges for the former redevelopment project and the former redevelopment project provided for that. In the very near future this
Any other questions . Thats the model there. If its light enough to if i can make mention about the model as part of your decision today you are waving two requirements, one is to have this model redone. This is the model that was done previously. The only difference here is i dont know what the scale is but a quarter inch. This is a three 3 story model and also since they are at the construction document stage which is more in Design Development, these four stages of design, we are going to wave that they have to come back with a Design Development to staff since its a less detailed document construction. I just wanted to mention the model that there are no changes. Okay. Thank you, the only comment that i would like to make for the record that when we heard the report on sbe participation and nb e participation that bernard came up with the last report, when we got the annual report, kudos to leonardcious sounds like things are moving. Its in the right direction, i think it was 92 pe