Expenditures and interested partis can see where the projects are and where their status is. With that, i leave with or you with the resolution before you and if you have any questions, i would be happy to answer. Thank you very much, mr. Brill do members of the board have questions or comments . No. Do we have any members of the public . No, no members of the public. Point of order, just come forward if you want to speak. That is all. You think a Ballot Initiative will put a bond on the measure is going to fix this situation . Its not going to fix the situation. Stop paying other city departments work orders. Stop coming to the public, stop trying to squeeze money stop trying to squeeze water out of a turnip from the employees. What you need to do is sit down, all of you, think about how you are spending your money . Wasteless projects like this one is a waste im a voter of san francisco. And im definitely voting no against this. What needs to happen is mta reform. Now a vote for init
Smarter parking management. All of this was designed to help other cities learn from our experience and improve on it. So after that, to jump into the evaluation itself. Demand responsive pricing was at the heart of the project, a natural place to start is how did we effect rates . And many people were concerned at the beginning of the project that sfpark would be an excuse for the sfmta to simply raise rates and even in the context of an increasing population and booming economy, we saw that on average we lowered onstreet rates by 4 . And hourly rates at garages by about 12 . And what you see here is an average rate at meters of 2. 58, but that represents an average of sf metered hours, 30 our meters hours are 1 an hour or less and 17 are 0. 25 an hour and at other end of the spectrum, 6 an hour. Of course we changed rates to make it easier to park, to find a parking space and the core measure of that is the amount of time that it was hard to find a space and how much we reduced that
Committee. They have the purview and accountability to do audits and reports on bond expenditures and this bond will be part of that existing process. Individual appropriations go through the board of supervisors and bond issuances as well. Should the bond pass a dedicated website will be created to report on the expenditures and interested partis can see where the projects are and where their status is. With that, i leave with or you with the resolution before you and if you have any questions, i would be happy to answer. Thank you very much, mr. Brill do members of the board have questions or comments . No. Do we have any members of the public . No, no members of the public. Point of order, just come forward if you want to speak. That is all. You think a Ballot Initiative will put a bond on the measure is going to fix this situation . Its not going to fix the situation. Stop paying other city departments work orders. Stop coming to the public, stop trying to squeeze money stop trying
This summary presentation is a distillation of the present. The full report is 150 pages or so, available online. It is lessons learned, as well as a separate technical it guide to help save other cities time and money as they pursue smarter parking management. All of this was designed to help other cities learn from our experience and improve on it. So after that, to jump into the evaluation itself. Demand responsive pricing was at the heart of the project, a natural place to start is how did we effect rates . And many people were concerned at the beginning of the project that sfpark would be an excuse for the sfmta to simply raise rates and even in the context of an increasing population and booming economy, we saw that on average we lowered onstreet rates by 4 . And hourly rates at garages by about 12 . And what you see here is an average rate at meters of 2. 58, but that represents an average of sf metered hours, 30 our meters hours are 1 an hour or less and 17 are 0. 25 an hour an
And what you see here are the seven pilot areas covering about 25 of the citys metered spaces and 13 of our 19 garages. What you dont see on the map are two control areas the Inner Richmond and union street, where we did the same level of Data Collection, but none of the policy or technology changes. Part of the sfmta rispontto gather an unprecedented amount of data to enable a truly rigorous evaluation of the project, both by our team, as well as an independent federal evaluation team, whose report will be released this fall. This slide gives a highlight of the schedule, and its a little hard to read. But the highlights are the funding was it was announced that we received the funding in fall of 2007. We didnt actually have the funding in hand to spend until the summer of 2009; which meant we were running as fast as we can to launch the project in 2011 and did our rate change in the summer of 2011 and we continued rate changes through today, but with the formal twoyear Data Collection