woman to serve on the supreme court. all the members of the court, i am pleased to welcome justice jackson to the court and to our common calling. [ applause ] her elevation to justice coming at an incredibly politically fraught moment for that court following the conservative-leaning bodies overturning of roe v. wade. joining me is nbc news justice correspondent pete williams, nyn professor and former law clerk melissa murray, and politico author eugene daniels. appreciate you joining us on this. pete, before we get to the history-making moment, i want to talk specifically about the two decisions that came down, really kind of a split decision for the biden administration here. reporter: that s true. the easier one to talk about is the remain in mexico program. supreme court said the biden administration went about it the right way trying to end this program that was launched during the trump administration. that required the government to send asylum seekers back
another jampacked hour in news ahead. history is the first african- american woman takes her place on the supreme court. plus, with what more could the january 4th committee learned from trumps white house counsel. all that coming up. . and looking to buy life insurance on a fixed budget, remember the three ps. what are the three ps? the three ps of life insurance on a fixed budget are price, price, and price. a price you can afford, a price that can t increase, and a price that fits your budget. i m 54, what s my price? you can get coverage for $9.95 a month. i m 65 and take medications. what s my price? also $9.95 a month. i just turned 80, what s my price? $9.95 a month for you too.
all right. welcome back. so the president is set to deliver a major speech on the january 6th committee s findings once the panel actually wraps up their investigation. sources telling nbc news it s going to focus on what we have to lose as a country if the former president or his allies return to power in washington. this week s testimony from cassidy hutchinson has drastically upped the pressure on the justice department to take action and on trump allies to testify. trump s former white house counsel, pat cipollone, has been subpoenaed to appear before the committee. hutchinson s bombshell testimony put him at the center of that day s violent events. the subpoena coming amid warnings on alleged witness tampering. liz cheney telling abc news that the panel is prepared to slap anyone who tried to influence testimony with a criminal referral. so you think some of the testimony you received wasn t truthful because people were threatened? the way that i would put it is that it gives
well, we know that pat cipollone was one of the most strident opponents of the stop-the-steal campaign and a lot of that outside advisers that were promulgated that information to the former president. we know he had concerns at many levels of what was happening and expressed those to others in the white house. the testimony indicated that. others said that, as well. the former president had quite a difficult vitriolic relationship within the time, he would often castigate him because cipollone would say no to the former president and would try to shoot down what he viewed as some of more of his hair brained ideas. cipollone also has told a confident that he is not inclined to want to testify in front of the committee. that these believes that there should be privilege issues and he should not talk about his conversations with the former president. that it gets at a precedent for white house counsels going forward, and he has not wanted to go through a video testimony or public tes
center of the committee s work is likely at this point the next republican standard bearer, making him the most powerful republican in the party and very much the centerpiece of the january 6th committee s work. perking up our ears and giving us sleep anxiety. let s be real. let s be real. let s say the truth here. josh, let s talk through cipollone here. a subpoena obviously now delivered to cipollone. we know obviously the way in which cassidy laid out some of the things that he said throughout that day on january 6th, one is if we actually go to the capitol, there are a lot of criminal charges we could be we could see in our future. we also know as the committee has said, he has sat for a quote/unquote informal engagement back in april, right. so why do you think now the committee believes it is so incredibly important to have him come in and give likely closed door testimony but on the record testimony?