america. this book does that, and why it is important too the title never give an inch: fighting for the america i love. that is why you to things that keep mark safe, you can t give an inch, once you compromise and round the corners. the secular left. progressives they will take a mile, we can t let america begin to erode in that way, we ll wake up some day, america will look fundamentally different than what your founders bequeathed to us. mike is a man of convictions. and principles. not afraid to stant up to the staup stand up to status quo or make harder decisions. i had a lot of dealings with the secretary, i spent a lot of time with diplomatic missions with him. i can tell you every time mike was in the room, people knew america was there. we always knew who our boss was, the american people, we have to get it right for america, we could never take risks that would put us in a place. we shorthanded this america first, but it was thinking about america, as this
montana, but military officials say they have been monitoring it since january 28 over alaska. president biden said he wanted it taken down wednesday, but was advised it was best to wait until you it wasn t over public spaces. i m jon scott, now to one nation. brian: welcome to one nation. i m brian kilmeade. on our show tonight, mike rowe, and mike loftus made sketch comedy funny again. first let s begin here. i want to begin with border fiction. first up the bus to the southern border. i thought the republicans and democrats would agree that our border is wide open. it s almost impossible to ignore the unprecedented numbers of migrant encounters. we are averaging 2,450 a day. that s 300,000 known got aways. the amount of drugs seized is more than seized in all of 2019 and 2022 combines. enough to kill he american. yes, that s you. the border crossers evading our own acts up 40% in the del rio sector alone. it makes total sense that the republicans would choose the borde
tonight. i am going to take a contrarian view. i have got some questions. here is my first question about this story. the china balloon story. this is like laughter out of uncomfortablity. i can t believe this actually happened. right? sow china. they seem to have chosen the most low tech spying mechanism possible to humiliate the united states. a balloon. when my grandmother took me to the zoo when i was a kid with my grandfather, i got a balloon. it s the same technology china is flying over the united states. over sensitive nuclear facilities on the cusp of a major meeting between the two countries. i have some serious questions here. right before this major diplomatic meeting where tony blinken, our secretary of state is supposed to meet xi jinping, china picks a freakin balloon to fly over? not their version of an sr-71? no, a , a balloon we can all se. something doesn t make sense. what particular capability is china demonstrating if this is some kind of message? we can
pentagon on saturday t it down as soon as possible. they decided without doing any damage to anyone on the ground, they decided that the best withoutot any damage to anyone n the ground. the best time to do that was over water lly took it down. maria: but at what cost? coming up, the new chairman of the house select committee we successfully took it down. but at what cost. former marine also a member of the house armed services and don intelligence committees on how much damage has been done in one week after the secretary ofca state initially suggest just canceling his trip was enough. other response from america. a violation of our sovereignty, a violation of international law. it was very important.s we, of course, take the time to protect our people. this is unacceptable action. large enough to hold three? massive buses.s did it drop and scatter devicesa for unlimitemed surveillance. john radcliffe on the potential capabilities of the a stratospheric balloon.lr was
china watcher gorden chang warning we must prepare for war because of it. he means what he says. it s all coming up. welcome, everybody. glad to have you. i m neil cavuto. let s get to it with jacqui at the white house. jacqui? the washington post has been reporting that the chinese spy balloon s path over the u.s. may have been driven by the wind and that analysts are examining the possibility that the chinese did not intend to penetrate the american heartland with their surveillance equipment. i m told that that is not the full story. we re learning a lot more right now. officials tell me that we don t know if the balloon s direction over the continental u.s. was intentional. because it s a balloon, its trajectory depends on a range of factors that includes the wind. the balloon also went over guam, we ve learned, which is u.s. territory. it also later loitered over several sensitive sites in the continue continental u.s. the chinese still had the ability to maneuver