Gotten deep into this know that it would be theres the issue of the tunnel and how where the train goes underground and how that fits with the freeway and thats how the issue became [speaker not understood] as to what we do with the freeway. So, i think we need to continue to emphasize when were talking about this very large and complex set of issues that the driver is transportation. It is not just the opportunity to develop more property. Thats a secondary part. And if we do develop the property, it could generate revenues which can be reinvested in transportation. Thank you. Thank you, mr. Haft. Is there any other member of the public who would like to comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. I want to thank mr. Ram and everyone, i see mr. Light here from the mayors office. Everyone is working very hard on these issues to make sure that we dont miss any opportunities as electrification and highspeed rail move forward. So, i know well continue to work hard to make positive ch
Welcome to the march 6, 2013 meeting of the San Francisco board of appeals. The presiding officer tonight is board president kurt fong and joined by the Vice President anne lazarus and commissioners arcelli and darrell honda. [speaker not understood] will be off this evening. Robert brian will provide the board with any legal advice this evening. And at the control of the boards legal assistant victor pacheco. Im the executive director. We are also joined this evening representatives. Scott sanchez is the zoning administrator. He is also representing the Planning Department and. Jeannine young is here from the department of Public Health Environmental Health section. And i believe joseph duffy is here as well, senior building inspector representing the building of building inspection. Mr. Pacheco, at this time if you could please go over the boards meeting guidelines and conduct the swearing in process. The board requests that you turnoff all phones and pagers so they will not disturb
A state Superior Court ruling said the justices did not believe the claim that the state’s law prohibiting a person from possessing a firearm if they had been convicted of a list of 38 offenses was invalidated by the higher court’s ruling in the case of a New York law struck down in 2022.