realm, to make this a very lively, active, socially vibrant edge to the city. here is the current view at jackson street, looking back toward the embarcadero. our proposal is to take down the pedestrian freeway and replace it with this. this is a view of the new jackson st., is. you can see it supported by cafes and retail. finally, back along pacific park. likewise, open spaces, looking at places in which children can play, adults can enjoy espresso, picnics, and have a child- friendly place. we can review the details later. i too will be one of the most environmentally innovative buildings in the city. the values then talked about, fiduciary values. more and would leave the value this brings to a new waterfront for our city that would permanently affect, we think, a great new civic edge for a global city of san francisco. we can now have the block of time for ms. astor and her group. let me change the microphone, just a moment. ok, go ahead. sue hester. first, i want to
proposed to include grass seating areas, and children s play areas, as well as seating for an adjacent cafe. these bases would strengthen and expand an existing network of richly-landscape pedestrian connections. the project also includes 255 parking spaces within the garages that would be accessible to the general public in order to restore the health club and other resources on the site and to provide parking and other waterfront uses in the vicinity. several other parking facilities have been recently removed or proposed for future removal. therefore the amount of non- residential is appropriate for the project. however, in terms of residential parking, a project proposes 134 parking spaces to serve it well unit, and they are requesting a modification to the limitations maximum of 54 residential spaces provided within the district. given the pedestrian-friendly site, that is recommending the residential parking be reduced to correspond to the ratios permitted in the downto
smaller 8 washington shown in yellow and makes the transition from the city to the waterfront. but perhaps it would be best shown in three dimensions. it is a three-dimensional plan as well as the process. the current on global as 84 feet across the entire length and width of all three blocks. it also allows up to 600 dwelling units. our first design began with piercing this envelope through jackson and pacific to create a cree legend between neighborhoods and the embarcadero. the design we have proposed, working with an 84-foot height, proposed two developments with a courtyard separating them, stepping down to the fitness center and eventually to a park on the north. the final revision in this is a step further. the entire street front is along the embarcadero down to under the 84 feet, and steps further down in with the aquatic and recreation center and then steps up away from the neighborhood to be the city, so you can see back away from the waterfront. as i mentioned, th
statement saying the planning commission does not have jurisdiction over port property. i think this is a patently false statement and calls into question the entire eir. section 240 of the planning code gives the planning commission jurisdiction over port property. there is also a city attorney opinion which is 86-05. it says that the above analysis demonstrates that even prior to the transfer of the port to the city, prior to the applicability of the city s police power to the court, under charter section 1.101, uses of poor lands were subject to the city s power for zoning procedures. i do not see how they can make this pattern statement that we do not have jurisdiction over property. over pork property. port property. we were previously given information. one of our hearings about the comment that the number of truck trips per day in the eir was responded to in the cnr document by upping the number of trips from 20 to 90. is that right? yes. also, that the peak hour t
to combine seawall to351 with digits in golden gateway land. undertook this project, came to the port in 2005, with this idea. at that point, this land the adjacent land was still under the purview of redevelopment, that redevelopment has now expired in time. but the waterfront land use plan, urging the exploration of how to combine these sites to maximize it, and reduce housing, retail, recreation, and open space, is what we hear about today. so i am going to rush through this a little bit so we can maximize mark s time on the design. but today, in front we are in front of you because we have entered into a tentative agreement, subject to your part final approval and the impact reports. it is to extend portions of the block. i think that saves 22,000 feet of the 27,000 feet of block 351 removed from the trust, paid for in large amounts of money. and then given back to the port in the form of public open space, so that, in fact, an excess of land, 1,250 square feet, wil