Do you make of the white house statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process
Breaking his silence, we have all angles covered. Also this full court press, now on to shape Public Opinion to get impeachment done by year end. Even though the house done vote it on, and before voters get to vote on it, decide for themselves, in election that is just about a year away. We have more on impeachment lifting the rock on biden family incorporated. And lifting the rock on the media and democrats demanding impeach trump before trump was elected. How democrats blasted impeachment as attack politics in 1998, what is different now. Beyond attack politics, they want to retax us, and a bigger government. We have real world proof that vision ruins the value of what you and your families work and invest for. We have a new tax hike idea from a 2020 democrat that people warning will crush jobs. We have general jack keane with us, from mideast to hong kong to china, were on it. I am elizabeth mcmacdonald. We start right now. Thank you for joining us, you are watching fox business net
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about
Statement that this impeachment probe is constitutionally valid invalid and violates due process. I may not use those words but i would say its constitutionally very troubling. To elaborate, the framers were ambivalent about impeachment power, debating whether to create it at all and who should exercise it. They understood that tremendous potential for misuse given the british parliamentary practice and the difficulty in cabining it a bit. They moved it to high crimes and misdemeanors, mentioning treason and bribery. What they expected was the house to unfold things with a certain decorum, follow certain procedures many i wouldnt use the word due process. I wouldnt think that applies in a constitutional sense. Paul thats what i want to focus on, david. Seems to me, you look at the language of the constitution, what it says is the house has the power to impeach, high crimes and misdemeanors and so on but it doesnt say how it goes about it. The due process protections that we think about
Looking across the next year. Its clear that the u. S. Economy is slowing somewhat. The chances are quite low. We are so consumeroriented and we run a trade deficit. Other countries like germany are much more dependent on exports. It is much harder on them i think its fair to say that the u. S. Economy is slowing particularly manufacturing which is a big part of the volatility of the economy. The manufacturing globally seems to be in a recession in my right about that . Speemac as i said the u. S. Economy is about 85 services and 15 manufacturing. They make up a big portion of the corporate profits in the big part of the volatility of the economy. A big part of high wage jobs. It is hard to do these policies. We can argue whether its appropriate to trade policies are sterilizing some of the supply side affects. We have a big increase in Capital Investment in the wake of an attack reform. Now, that has fallen off. Do you think, that seems to have that trade is the big corporate there. A