while simultaneously encouraging much of the third world to move here without permission. fences are awesome for that. w but walls, as nancy pelosi has explained, walls are immoral. according to cnn, walls are nothing less then an attack on the human heart. listen and learn. and a wall won t solve it. all he s doing is putting up walls around people s hearts. we are not a wall away from being better. don t waste billions of dollars of taxpayer money in order to build something that will not make our border more secure. tucker: that s the other point they keep making. walls don t work. they are totally ineffective except in prisons and the vatican and outside barack obama s house here in washington and almost every upper income neighborhood in america where walls surround the front lines of the homes hillary clinton and beto o rourke hold their fund-raisers. but among international borders, walls are useless.
tucker: that s paris, not a war zone. dana perino hosts the daily briefing of course with dana perino. great to see you. thanks for having me. tucker: i think the argument over whether climate change is happening is less interesting than the debate over what we do about it and i m just so struck by the people were telling us, and maybe they are right, i don t know, i m not a climate scientists, that this is really the moral question of her time, an existential threat to life as we know it. really not making the kind of sacrifices from someone you think sincerely believed the threat was that profound. what he think that is? that has been true for all the years that we ve been talking about this. i ve cut my teeth on capitol hill as a staffer for the chairman of the energy and power subcommittee.s. when janet yellen came and talked about global warming way back then. i m dating myself a little bit and even back then you knew immediately that there were
a pesky legal antique called the constitution. watch this. i would love to be able toal regulate the content of speech. the first amendment prevents me from doing so and that is simply a function of the first amendment but i think over the long run it s better the government does not regulate the content of speech. tucker: the cnn anchors nodding of course we all like to regulate speech if we could. over the long run he says it s better not to regulate speech. does that sound like someone who is deeply committed to a free society and its benefits or is it simply a bully admitting that for now the law won t let him do for now the law won t let him do what he wants to do, which is control your mind? i think you know the answer. the left increasinglyif is using big tech, threats and public shaming to stamp out political views it doesn t like. they re also ruining actors and comedians and anyone else who dares to stray from the script.
does it mean that because we feel so bad about something that our leaders did 30 years ago we have to pay the penance of illegal immigration? doesn t mean we have an obligation to fix those countries? if so, how do we do that?ga i think investment in partnership with the democratically elected leaders in those countries tucker: where has that worked? anywhere ever?r? has that ever worked? we spent all this money abroad and it seems to just make the countries more corrupt and the average person more poorer and desperate to come here. has it ever worked? i think there are certainly ways we can do this where it would work. and we ve always had the goal of colonizing a place where we actually try to help them. i think the best bet is to go and enter into partnerships with democratic leaders. tucker: since we are in thete reparations business. i m open minded about everything, as you know. but if we old latin america something, what if they flooded our communities with drugs andpa
about this extensively in my book trump and the jews. they came to america as legal immigrants. they came only to work hard and only to be full americans. that was their goal. so i ve heard people like alexandria ocasio-cortez from new york, the congresswoman, talking about how the immigrants, the migrants are just like the asylum-seekers, the jewish immigrants who were seeking to escape the nazis in world war ii. it s an obscene comparison i ve heard it too many times from the left. so yes, there were some of the israeli left were complaining and even accusing the israeli y government of racism, but the fact is that now nobody is complaining. everybody is happy that we don t have illegal immigration with israel. tucker: that s an amazingve