Doing so would be a serious escalation of the war, but Keir Starmer said moscow started the conflict and can end it by withdrawing its troops from ukraine. Our Political Editor Chris Mason was on the prime Ministers Plane, and sent this report shortly after landing. The Prime Minister arriving here in washington with the foreign secretary, David Lammy Sir Keir Starmer s second visit to the White House in two months. Ukraines allies remain rather guarded in their public remarks about a change in policy on the use of Western Missiles inside russia. But the diplomatic dashing to arrive at a decision is in plain sight and that has proved enough for President Putin to say this. Translation if this decision is made, it will mean nothing other than direct participation of nato countries, the United States, I European countries. In the war in ukraine. It is their direct participation and this, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. This will mean that nato countries
situation again where this administration has drawn a red line and the chinese communist party has crossed it willy-nilly. they said if lethal assistance was provided there would be real cost to china. they ve done nothing in the face that we can see a deal between xi and putin that will put the people of ukraine at risk, europe and the united states as well. dana: politico has a piece today that says biden administration lack of information on spy flight. what the biden administration isn t telling congress about spy balance saying the delay on release of information raises questions about the extent to which the u.s. fully understands what intelligence foreign governments may be collecting without washington s knowledge. you were also at the c.i.a. not just the state department. is it possible there are things that are just kept secret for our own national security purposes or are they trying to hide something because they don t know? dana, it s certainly possible
this administration has drawn a red line and the chinese communist party has crossed it willy-nilly. admit china is trying to grow their influence in the world. they disputed claims that china try in recent years to grow their influence over the president times. oversight says they have got bank records showing chinese energy company paying three biden family members through a third party. what were they paid for? look, i m just not going to respond to that from here. look, we have heard from house republicans for years and years and years how how the inaccuracies the lies, when it comes to this issue. peter: that represents a real split. the oversight of the committee says they got bank records from a financial institution after subpoena white house say theying many questions auto what exactly
don t single out this president as if we ve always done the right thing. very haven t and we we haven t and we should. martha: we heard from king abdullah, said basically the same thing. leadership from the united states in order to follow through on some these issues. we can t willy-nilly bring these things up, gee it would be great if we could do something about it but we just can t. finds us in a very, very interesting spot in history. thank you very much. alan mercedes, good to see you both. bill: 20 one minutes past the hour, is the u.s. economy sliding backwards? new numbers sounding alarm. varney tackles that. how do you get a 150-pound mountain lion out of a crawl space in your home? that is a good question. help join a continent with nearly
boehner is slow-walking, piecemeal amnesty. neil: ronald reagan, for whom you worked, was famous for he what of that? what have we gotten with 7 are 80%. if barren i ll take 70%. but when you re announcing in advance, we re only half of one just surrendered. when he is saying, we will not shut down the federal government, he just surrendered. hide your cards and play tough, man. neil: you talk about changing the constitution. leaving aside the constitutional purists saying when you start that, thankfully you re going to hurt the constitution, because you re changing it willy-nilly. you say? the constitution is being changed willy-nilly all the time. everytime the supreme court meets, and we sit here in june on the edge of our chair with some breathtaking decision that