and her husband, gary, longtime residents of madison county, a quaint midwestern community about 30 miles from st. louis, became victims of a crime. it wasn t a particularly vicious or heinous crime, more like petty theft. but it is frequent, and they re frustrated. the first time they hit the truck, they took extension cords. the second time they took about the same amount of extension cords for the copper. the third time they took extension cord the replacement extension cord, and they took the welding blade. the theft may have only been extension cords, but they re worth a few thousand dollars. the hamiltons don t own the truck. it belongs to mr. hamilton s employer. so the theft really affects them. they don t want this to jeopardize his job. his company that he works for, they re really good to him, and it was just a courtesy that he could bring his truck home at night, and we felt we were obligated to try to find out who was doing it and to put a stop to it. so the hami
six years from the crime to this final result. do you think this has anything to do with the prevailing wisdom about the death penalty in arizona and elsewhere if it took two injuries to finally get to no decision? this was a tough case on the death penalty. it wasn t a tough case on guilt. it was quite obvious jody arias was guilty. i think it was a questionable decision on the part of the prosecution to go back a second time for another very expensive trial on the death penalty to receive precisely the same result, a hung jury. and now she cannot be retried a third time on the death penalty. this was a life in prison case all along it seemed to me and now that s the result. nancy grace, i want to bring you in. there s reporting from usa today, some reporters in the courtroom said that travis alexander s family, that is her victim, the family was leaving the courtroom and apparently
what did you tell him? i told her i kill men today. it wasn t a want to it was a need to. i had to get out of that situation i was in today. i m not nervous. i m just emotional. reporter: emotional the last time she saw her husband. just said we love each other and gave each other a hug and a kiss like we always did. reporter: later she said he thought something was wrong. he thought he was doing a good thing. he sounded a little irritated when you talked to him that afternoon? it was very short, and it wasn t like you re interrupting a good time. it s like i wish i could say more but there s people around. reporter: that s the last
well shgs, i have not, but dana, from where i am, it was not a whole lot of them around certainly mot the numb lyly not the numbers that we saw last week and in the crowd of about 450 where i can see and count from where i am standing maybe 50, or maybe even less, and then some of them were not nypd at all, and they were officers from other jurisdictions who wanted to make the point that they stand alongside the nypd on this issue, but it wasn t a majority and it was not half. it was a few. and their commissioner william bratton, when he made this plea for them not to do this today, he said look it is not a mandate and i won t discipline anybody over it, but i am asking that this day not become about this conversation that we are having right now, that it become that the narrative stay with officer liu and his family
in june 2007, pam hamilton and her husband, gary, longtime residents of madison county, a quaint midwestern community about 30 miles from st. louis, became victims of a crime. it wasn t a particularly vicious or heinous crime, more like petty theft. but it is frequent, and they re frustrated. the first time they hit the truck, they took extension cords. the second time they took about the same amount of extension cords for the copper. the third time they took extension cord the replacement extension cord, and they took the welding blade. the theft may have only been extension cords, but they re worth a few thousand dollars. the hamiltons don t own the truck. it belongs to mr. hamilton s employer. so the theft really affects them. they don t want this to jeopardize his job. his company that he works for, they re really good to him, and it was just a courtesy that he could bring his truck home at night, and we felt we were obligated to try to find out who was doing it and to put