oor they went to respond to a call that was less serious. the woman on the phone is saying please hurry. he said he had eaten pot-laced candy before this went down and he is saying please hurry. and what do you say to that, kent? home was 1.1 miles away from the very busy police station. it wasn t a 12 minute response time. published reports say it was 15 minute and that is double the average response time. more than double the average response for denver police for similar incidenincidents.
they did have higher food costs and that offset strong sales. we are all paying higher prices for beef, avocado, cheese, and so, too, is chipotle and they could be better with those earnings if those costs weren t so high. i love my job, you love your job, but i would be happy to get fired if the same thing happened to me as happened to a former ceo. tell us about this unbelievable story. back in january, yahoo ceo mayer fired decastro, he was the company coo and second in charge to mayer. she said, look, he wasn t executing her plan for reviving advertising growth after 15 months with the company. so we knew that he got fired. it wasn t a surprised. what was a surprise like you mentioned was the severance package. we just now got the details, got the golden parachute. got $58 million. he worked for the company for 15 months. yes. he gets fired and he gets $58
residents of madison county, a quaint midwestern community about 30 miles from st. louis, became victims of a crime. it wasn t a particularly vicious or heinous crime, more like petty theft. but it is frequent, and they re frustrated. the first time they hit the truck, they took extension cords. the second time they took about the same amount of extension cords for the copper. the third time they took extension cord the replacement extension cord, and they took the welding blade. the theft may have only been extension cords, but they re worth a few thousand dollars. the hamiltons don t own the truck. it belongs to mr. hamilton s employer. so the theft really affects them. they don t want this to jeopardize his job. his company that he works for, they re really good to him, and it was just a courtesy that he could bring his truck home at night, and we felt we were obligated to try to find out who was doing it and to put a stop to it. so the hamiltons set up a surveillance came
to to ferret out and prevent this kind of terrorism. you know, and the reason that everybody lauds snowden or the ones who do is because of his revelations on privacy. but that is a fraction of the revelations he has done, which have to do with secrets. the military intelligent secrets of the united states which he has undoubtedly given the russians which in and of itself is an act of treason and probably the chinese as well. so, yes, we should have a debate, even lectures on the constitution. but that s the wrong guy to give it and he doesn t deserve the airing. i wouldn t ban airing him under the first amendment. but americans on their own ought to shun a man like that. it wasn t a reference to him being a fugitive from justice or where he was or, really a question that was pointed at all in this conference. no. it was his people who are conducting the so-called interview. so while it didn t reveal anything, he had an audience that was entirely behind
yeah, next term, the supreme court is like academic years, it s either 2014-2015 or 2015-2016. i think that depends if the conservatives want to say, let s grab it now while we have a chance. on arizona, i have to ask you what you made of the veto message from governor brewer tonight. we played it all i think. it wasn t a particularly long statement. are there constitutional issues here for this matter? is this something that would have had a hard time in court had she signed it? it s interesting to piece the two things together, you think about the forums in which religion has the most force. the courts are like the worst place in order to try to get a religious belief codified or encoded into law. because the way in which the supreme court. you have to have a secular purpose for the law.