better explicate it you one of the independent people who experienced it. i think the committee has been meticulous and thorough and i think they brought t light an incredible amount o truth. i think that they ve managed t look at the 64 days between th election and january 6th and from that point on, they v managed to provide the facts and the motivations for many o the key protagonists for thi period a and we can show you connection to the insurrection here - you re knowledge with the prou boys saying they found a kind o savior in trump. you also talk about how they were traffic ate the qanon themes
so, crowds are very dangerous. because you ve got so directly with the committee, i m curious about somethin that s more on a level o footnotes. but we re deep into ou coverage here. they did not meet their ow deadlines on the reports and here we are on an alternat news dump friday i mean, if you re-run this and imagine the different it came out basically in today s news cycle, you thin they were trying to bury it. they of course view this i something they want to get out there. i m curious if you had any vie about how this committee and did. and the self imposed deadlines in contrast to a lot of th hearings and other materials people felt experts say was [inaudible i agree, i think it was a very effective committee and i think their effectivenes kept providing with othe avenues they felt obliged to look at
emily, reading from the ne report, if again, i mentioned, those people little picks, really loyalists then she tells the committee that trump was speaking to powell this is one of the real dead and giuliani, by the, and wa opposing plots if you ca believe it and powell repeated this claim of foreign affairs - and the president knew new t the speakerphone, laughed, and said, this does sound crazy, doesn t it what do you think of this peak we get into this room that is kind of dismiss? the that even if you weren t concerned about rule of law an democracy, which many people are, - you might say, gosh, what cavalier attitude towards th people that he leans on. and the people he sends danger and the people, many of whom o the physical, side are going t be doing years in prison and you might think the mas
turning a failed coup into a practice session for next time in that sense, the committee i finishing its work with this exhaustive, meticulous pile of evidence and handing it to attorney general garland, literally because the doj and specia counsel has started to take th files this week. taking what we have this wee and supporting materials this committee is basicall saying to doj, don t you see what s here? yes, lady justice is suppose to be blind. because she personifies judge. weighing evidence, blindfolded without fear or favor of the judgments of those peopl involved but let me say this clearly on a day like today let me say it to merrick garland. you, mister attorney general are supposed to be able to see to lead the prosecutors wh actually put the evidence on
gathering. here is ready describing the trick that if there was enough confusion about the electors dueling slates, et cetera, i might turn january 6th into cat fight in congress with pence presiding. the only reason we know this i the committee got mark meadows emails indeed, a new footnote in th report shows that damning memo there. you see that the bottom of the screen it s just from one of th emails that was forwarded. the investigation also uncovered the lengths trump team went to enact this. and that goes from giulian pressing the officials i meetings and frantic voicemails, to more public and sometimes physical pressure. - mister speaker, this is rud giuliani and - recalling you together because we d like to discuss obviously the election what can you and i do too slight legislation besidescolin although, we should not do that i understand you don t want to talk to me now