,a story in five words. hanks only four goodanks, on movies. you knowor good , jimmy , in a t interview, tom hanks said that four of his movies are pretty good. out of the 80 plus he s made. do you agree with him? i mean, i enjoyed i really, andt like, die hardut and hotsy. yeah, that s too i think he s trying to be modest. f to i like a lot of tom hanksabou movies. like what? i like sully specifically because you re going to get so mad at me at this. but wheny. i was driving a taxi i dr in the day, which i know you don t know i did, but i drove a guy in my cab that was on that flight, which is very fascinating. and like, when you think. back to me, it was well, the dude was the plane was in the hudson, you know what i m saying? yeah. it si think, sully, when you watch now, it s like so illustrative of how we view the world because republicans are like, wow, they landed in the hudson. . democrats are like, wow, nobody has a mask on on the plane, youd know? but i always love su
Derrota cruel en tres momentos
mundodeportivo.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from mundodeportivo.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
i mean it s clear there are victims the dramatic congressional testimony from the tea part regroup leaders asked what was the affect of this targeting on your organization? the word they used it was first used by was we were rendered dormant before 2012 elections we we are rendered dormant. what about you? you? they said we were rendered dormant. you have effective conservative groups that were useless before the presidential election. that goes back to the lerner video. she said they want the irs to do it. if the irs hadn t been effective it still would have been a problem. they re still victims you just answered both of you chuck said there has been no victims which is the problem here, of course, when you neutralize an organization and movement, i don t care what it s i think that is wrong. then, try to cover tracks two, if democrats are missing a
it was all over the internet, her latest debate with mr. coons, and she thinks because she has been living in this fox news matt drudge rush limbaugh bubble for so long that he s the one who doesn t understand what the constitution is. but it was at a law school. so they were all laughing at her. because he actually quoted the first amendment. you know, they were debating separation of church and state. she probably heard ann coulter or some other conservative who actually does read and knows the constitution, she probably heard one of those people say, the exact phrase separation of church and state doesn t appear in the constitution, which is true, but she s never read the constitution and she doesn t know nuance. so she thinks separation of church and state, the concept is not in the constitution. so when chris coons actually quotes the constitution, she says, yeah, that s in the first amendment? yes, christine, it s i think for christine o donnell she thinks quoting the constitut