that s fine. do you think it s effective or pandering? people do go to diners when they want to get a pulse, why not a barber shop or beauty salon. if if donald trump put out an ad that featured people in a barber shop talking about why they were supporting him and not secretary clinton, i wonder if people would call that pandering, if you would if donald trump put out the same ad and we won t call it pandering, i won t call secretary clinton s ad pandering. if you would, i think it speaks for itself. hillary clinton actually has a record and a track record. and a real relationship with real black people. so it is very effective. so i m a fake black person. this is the conversation folks have in a barber shop in win field. donald trump would go to a nonafrican-american shop somewhere in the suburbs and
places like florida, i believe it is 40% increase of black voters, democrats, increased absentee battle, so that s good for her as far as enthusiasm is concerned. paris, what do you think of the ald? i know you want to continue to talk about pivot, and that s fine. do you think it is effective or think it is pandering? because people go to diners when they want to get a pulse. why not a barber shop or beauty salon? look, all i will say is this. i think if donald trump put out an ad that featured people in a barber shop talking about why they re supporting him and not secretary clinton, i wonder if people would call it pandering. if donald trump put out the same ad and we wouldn t call it pandering, then i won t call secretary clinton s ad pandering. if you would, i think it speaks for itself. yeah, okay. don, the difference here is hillary clinton actually has a record and a track record and a real relationship with real black people. so it is very effective.
question is where is america and where is its loyalties and is it going to be here to protect us in the future? there s a lot we disagree with. s for our troops to meet on the battlefield. thank you very much. carly fiorina said is tongue in cheek but twitter called it pandering. did the presidential candidate turn her back on her alma mater
get the republicans, you get and you make deals, right? he can t do that. he can t do that. so he s going to sign another executive order having to do with the second amendment, having to do with guns. i will veto that. i will unsign that so fast, so fast. still ahead here on way too early the nfl playoff picture is finally set. the matchups, plus complete highlights. and carly fiorina calls it tongue-in-cheek but twitter called it pandering. did the presidential candidate turn her back on her alma mater to score political points? those stories and a check on weather when way too early on this monday morning comes right back.
it s not going to work. it just doesn t work. i mean, 10%? that would not bring in enough money to run this government. it s so simplistic. how about rand paul. rand paul is another flat tax guy. 14.5%. ted cruz is a flat tax guy. i don t know what the percentage is that he wants, but he s a flat tax guy. is any of that realistic? we ve heard candidates talk about that in the past. no one s ever risen up to the front runner status. i don t think it is realistic. it s reaching for the stars. it s going too far. is it pandering? no, i don t think it s pandering. which of these republican candidates in your view has a realestic campaign to run against hillary clinton with? i think jeb bush, donald trump, john kasich, marko rubio. they have realistic plans. rubio would lower the tax to 35%.