is it pandering? of course it is and we re thrilled? why are you thrilled about that? she s saying to the immigrant community you have been marginalized and invisible for too long. we understand you re hardworking family folks. these kids she met with are valedictorians who want to go to ivy league schools but can t because of their status. she s saying you are us and we ll treat you like us. that is a significant throwdown. if that s pandering, i ll take it. frank, the problem is that when you do say that and throw down the gauntlet on that you are expected to act on it if you get to power. and the problem is and we ve seen this on democrats and republicans alike that they may play a certain game when they re talking but then it s all semantics. they don t really act and the action has come from obama in the white house. that s about it. that s right. that s right. but listen she s made a promise. of course we have to hold her accountable. of course we have to keep pushing h
the party has in going down that road is you cannot out-pander the democrats on tax credits. hillary clinton is always going to be able to outbid him. who is more electable then? kim calls it pandering. i call it moderation because i think most republicans want to win above all else. just think, a general point. on the republican side, you ve got these young attractive articulate candidates competing with one another, saying interesting things. on the other side, you have one candidate, hillary clinton, who has got to keep her act afloat for the next 19 months. as we said in the last block, to be continued. yes, we will. now, when we come back, the white house drops its veto threat as the iran bill moves to the full senate for consideration. so is that a setback for the president?t? and does it really give congress a say in a final nuclear deal? and stay awake during the day. this is called non-24. learn more by calling 844-824-2424. or visit your24info.com.
the problem that rubio is going to have is that when that is placed next to, for instance, very simple flat tax proposals by some of the other candidates, it does potentially look a little bit complicated and old-fashioned and not bold enough. but kim doesn t it look more electable? when you ve got ted cruz out there saying put it all on a postage card, that s your tax return, that is a radical proposal. behind this, the argument behind rubio s thing is that we need to make a pitch to middle class voters, they don t really care about income tax cuts on the top rates but they ll like it if they get more child tax credit money. the problem that rubio has and the party has in going down that road is you cannot out-pander the democrats on tax credits. hillary clinton is always going to be able to outbid him. who is more electable then? kim calls it pandering. i call it moderation because i think most republicans want to win above all else. just think, a general point. on the republ
it s pandering of the worst order. coburn is not a fringe gop politician. he s not a fringe guy. he s a smart guy. mainstream. level-headed. ala lindsey graham a few years ago when he was talking about naturalization. they know full well this isn t going to happen. but they get in these town hall meetings and people show up with their pitch forks, and burning the president in effigy not literally but why pander like this? for me, i wouldn t call it pandering, but what i definitely think it is they re practicing the politics of deflection. they have no real cohesive leadership. their intent is to make sure that the town halls do not focus on the lack of what the gop has. instead, there s constant deflection, let s shine the light on what the president s doing, defund obama care. obama care is now law. what do you think you re going
republicans aside and say they don t care about this. i think we are showing that we do share similarities with the hispanic community and our values are very closely aligned. reporter: the democratic governors in both states say they will sign the tuition equity bills into law. bill: not everyone, i d imagine is happy about this shift. explain that, dan. reporter: well, no, we interviewed a college student at oregon state university who is paying out of state tuition because she grew up in california. she can t understand why someone who is in the country illegally is getting what amounts to a great state subsidy and she is paying north of 22 grand a year. 13 states already allow illegal to pay in-state tuition rates. opponents call it pandering by republicans that will not help come election time. you should stand on what is right. to give special benefits to people who are illegally in the country, to the detriment of citizens is flat out wrong.