than in other areas. this is a court that seems t have a separate jurisprudenc when it comes to abortions they seem to be very engaged i limiting access to abortion. this case is perhaps a littl bit unusual because it doe involve fda approval of a drug and whether that should be withdrawn. but i don t think anyone shoul be optimistic that the court will suddenly become a champio of women s rights to mak decisions about their ow medical care so, joyce, i sat down i read this ruling as best i could, as someone who does not have a j.d., as holy taken not to go to law school. and i was struck by what seeme to me to be a pretty clear argument from kacsmaryk abou fetal personhood and so, i want to read to yo from someone smarter than i, and you can tell me they got i right. this is a new slate from law professor liu lippman. and she writes, the opinio hints that kacsmaryk is no content to simply banned the specific medication. elsewhere in the opinion, he
and responsible for the slaughter of russians, people were just picked up off of streets.d professionals. activists. opposition leaders. show me the man and i ll show you the crime.se you see that in the modernchin day communist china, you see it in modern day russia and modern day iran and north c korea.ubyou huber and now in modern dayman man. atlanta. washington, d.c. s democrat party is reallyngto become in many ways a totalitarian party. a police state. which it keeps promoting,ce centralization of power. does note, t like opposition. it doe,s not like challenges. it does not like debate. it demands and seeks too impose its will. i study this. this is what that i do.
know him at that time either soon, everyone in town wa wondering what had caused he death. the pathologist who performe the autopsy a day later, noted some trauma. a small abrasion on her uppe lip, and another mark inside that appear to be cut. curtis mention that cory had fallen in the days before he death. those false could v captured that injury to her lip? presumably i wish i knew but yes. a fall can account for a injury the pathologist also notice that cory had a fatty liver. also caused by heavy drinking. still, the doctor ruled th death undetermined she did noah killed her a this point that was what s was frustrating. she did find a disease of th litter, which can be associate with sudden death. unusual for women to die of unknown causes, but it doe happen without more to go on, the detective close the case cory s mother, marty, still in shock. could not bring herself to rea
oversaw the trump organization prosecution. because he now has the entir context. he can see what is comin around the corner, he sort o knows what to expect from th parties. the court systems are a very interesting system once you go into that courtroom and yo have the judge up on the bench and you have the parties and council table and you have the jurors there it sort of take on a very good, usually, goo system of its own. and all of the politics, all o the rhetoric outside, it doe not get into the core group. i think as a judge, this judge says his first sense o responsibility is going to b for the jurors the judges have a very protective nature about th jurors these are people who hav surrendered their daily lives, they have come into this syste that most of them don t have much familiarity with, and the are asked to do something of incredible importance where th consequences can be very severe
finance violations, or because of tax violations, we do not know the details of exactl what it is i will say, having looked little bit at the point clear about federal campaign violations being a dubious enhancement, i actually thin that is not right. i know that is what the trum folks are all saying, but at the end of the day, it doe seem like this estate charge can be enhanced to ace only if it is about a federal campaign finance violation of the so-called preemption doctrine. i do not think it s going to protect don t trump in the end but, at the end of the, da this is an indictment about misdemeanor, that is still significant. this is the first time a forme president has been held to account, whether it is a smaller criminal offense or larger criminal offense. it is a criminal offense but daniil, isn t it also a important reminder tha republicans are claiming xyz about the charges, we do not know what the charges are for. it is still sealed