christmas is this hit to judiciary and then they move forward. are they going to have hearings in judiciary or just behind the scenes? well i think that from what we re hearing i think they will have hearings. again a lot of it beyond just the flat out drawing up of the articles, we don t know, yet. the one wild card is john bolton. speaking of john bolton. he returned to twitter today. this is perfectly what you are talking about. for first time since he was fired or he left, whichever version you want to believe. he tweeted, glad to be back, for the back story stay tuned and we have liberated the twitter account previously suppressed in the aftermath of my resignation as national security adviser. more to come. do you think there is a chance he will testify before the house or in the senate trial should there be one. i have a hard time believing john bolton will be a member of the resistance here. however his lawyer teased that john bolton has information that isn t out t
court says he can. maybe this is indicating a change. glad to be back on twitter after a few months. stay tuned for the back story. is he going to talk? i guess, if he s making jest of all this, should he be? it s a serious matter. it is. i ll go back to fiona hill s testimony. john bolton was one of the administration officials that is came out of this looking okay. i mean, he is someone who pushed back, who didn t like what the administration was doing and with this sidetrack policy with ukraine. so his name has been out there. what this means, it s hard to divine, poppy. maybe he s trying to sell books. his lawyer has hinted that he does have information that isn t out there yet. that doesn t sound like someone who is going to go slowly
fencing where there are vulnerabilities, and enforcement on the visa overstays. but the president doesn t want to engage there because that does not fulfill the promise that he knows that he s not going to get, which is that he s going to build a wall, sea to shining sea, and that mexico is going to pay for that. we re never going to go for that. the american people don t want that. and it turns out when it comes to effective security, ana, that isn t going to stop the issue we all believe we need to address. he says he doesn t want a concrete wall anymore, though, he wants steel slats. when you look at the pictures on the border, it seems incredibly similar to fencing we already have in some places. does this create room for compromise? if the president can articulate where he needs steel slats and why, and we can agree on facts, yes, there is an ability to compromise. but the tweet that he put out earlier today, he s using the word wall. a wall to me is immoral between two alli
day. and we want congress to do their jobs and fund the government and get us back to work. how is the forest service being affected? i know both you and your husband work for the forest service. the public won t be able to go to the visitors center. our trail heads will not be maintained. we re susceptible to vandalism and resource damage. people maybe going off the road because our presence isn t out there as the forest service, damaging resources and theft. people can t get their firewood, they may just go up and cut their firewood without permits and be in areas they shouldn t be, which we may have to come back and restore. and so, you know, we re already getting backlogged with the work we ll have to catch up on, and on top of that we ll now probably have to do more restoration, more maintenance
what does that indicate to you, that 87 pages of a counterreport to a report that isn t out there yet that the president is calling a witch hunt isn t out there yet. i think it s anticipated based on conversations i m sure the president s lawyers have said with bob mueller s office on what s likely to be included in the report. some of that is anticipatatory, and their response won t be finalized until the report is actually issued. i do think what it suggests is the next shoe that s going to drop is likely to be not another proceeding against another individual or entity but the report itself. you think that s interesting. rudy giuliani told the atlantic in an interview he just did about the written answers he gave to mueller s questions, he said answering the questions was a nightmare. it took him, meaning the president, about three weeks to do what normally would take about two days. a nightmare, three weeks. if you re telling the truth, why that long?