innocent. why did the high court rule against him? you know, this is a tough case. this case was about the fact that prosecutors hid exculpatory evidence, and defense team found this years after he was on death row. and this man was arguing, listen, the district attorney, the person in charge, failed to train his prosecutors and failed to leth them know they had to turn over this evidence. supreme court said that s not true. this isn t a pattern of indifference, this was an isolated case. so, no, you re not going to get the $14 million that you were awarded. i will say this, this was a sharply divided supreme court, ruth bader ginsburg read her dissent from the bench and that is very unusual. and she said, no, this was wrong. he certainly should get the $14