investigation? let s be honest. the president looks at these people who spoke to the whistleblower as rats. they re rats to him. and that s how he looks at leakers and people who were concerned about his behavior. he sees them as rats. and he sees the whistleblower as a rat, not somebody who did his duty or her duty as, you know, was said this morning, you know. and so i think the president is furious. he says, i want to know who these people are, i want to get rid of them. what he doesn t understand is that will only inspire more people to talk to the investigating committees. there s that, but there s also it s one thing to not like rats or leakers. this is a completely different case here. this is a whistleblower who has legal protections and he just tried to obstruct that. we have so many legal questions for elliott specifically after the break, so many for you.
the president s deregulation, huge success. the new trade deals with mexico, can dark the european union, japan a big win for american goods. and by the way, i expect that the deal with china is going to be free and more fair at the end of the day. top it all off, americans are now safer. look at this. nationwide, violent crime is down significantly by a lot. and by the way, construction of the wall, the biggest unreported story this week, is well underway. the president this week, media isn t focused on it, after securing the $3.6 billion in new funding, the wall is going up. as we speak. the video on the screen is showing the progress at the border in yuma, arizona, that s last week alone, and the president saying we ll get 500 miles built by the end of next year. nancy pelosi is furious. she vowed to challenge the funding in court. problem is there are laws that
they have a world of expertise in the countries that we re concerned about. can i ask yes? reportedly, the president is furious, really mad about this. why do you think he s so mad? you know, i think the president is showing flashes of desperation. the fact that you would hire career professionals to do the work of the house intellect committee on intelligence, shouldn t concern the president of the united states. i think some of the people we re talking about are career workers who were involved in the obama administration. i think to believe the president and any of his concerns are to believe some sort of deep-state conspiracy. we re not he s implying that they re snatching people from his inner circle who are going to reveal critical information about the president of the united states. yeah. it s simply not true. it s the committee doing its work, bringing on qualified people. representative mike quigley, i appreciate your time. thank you. thank you. take care.
and really, the closest we came to that were some of what we ve seen reported and particularly the unredacted portions that were mistakenly revealed by manafort s attorneys about his dealings with kilimnik, where, for example, he was giving internal polling data to kilimnik. i ll tell you this doesn t surprise me. what i m interested in, whether reading a report or seeing in charges, what more there was in terms of the dealings between manafort and kilimnik. thank you, gentlemen, i appreciate it. president is furious the house intelligence committee hired former national security counsel staffers. a member of that committee, congressman mike quigley, responds next. is that for me? mhm aaaah! nooooo. nooooo.
safe from the cia, the fbi, and others. they have a world of expertise in the countries that we re concerned about. can i ask yes? reportedly, the president is furious, really mad about this. why do you think he s so mad? you know, i think the president is showing flashes of desperation. the fact that you would hire career professionals to do the work of the house intellect committee on intelligence, shouldn t concern the president of the united states. i think some of the people we re talking about are career workers who were involved in the obama administration. i think to believe the president and any of his concerns are to believe some sort of deep-state conspiracy. we re not he s implying that they re snatching people from his inner circle who are going to reveal critical information about the president of the united states. yeah. it s simply not true. it s the committee doing its work, bringing on qualified people. representative mike quigley, i appreciate your