prosecuted anybody for such a payment. you look at all the payments made to members of congress they prosecuted edwards for something similar. but please. john, hold on, let me finish. john, john, hold on. give me a chance to talk here. okay. when a prosecutor looks at a charge of a campaign violation, what they could do is see if the fec prosecuted it, and the fec said in the edwards case, we don t see a violation here. the other thing is somebody that does this type of violation has to do it knowing they are violating the law. i don t know how trump can know he s violating the law when the fec has never prosecuted a case like this and doesn t believe it s a violation of law. you can t have intent if the fec says it s not a violation.
that s five studies and a little more than a year that don t agree with each other, and one barely agrees with itself. when it comes to wine, what is good? we don t definitively know it, at least not in a one size fits all way. doctors say if you abstained so far, keep it that way. no need to start drink now, unless you have been indicted. if you are a wine lover, stick to one glass at dinner. even keith richards has potentially given up drinking after a lifetime of legendary success, and instead indulging in a glass of wine. all things in moderation. that s your reality check. that seems to be the boring sorry. answer to the end here to what was, i think, a fascinating and very exciting argument you are making there, but it s
a bullet for trump at some point and now has turned on him, obviously facing his own legal jeopardy, he has done that. and allen weissenburg who is also cooperating as they are making more of a case against trump s business dealings with russians, i think these are devastating moments. people who are so close to trump completely turning on him. not only a cause for deep, deep stress for trump, as we move forward, but just a remarkable development for somebody who prizes loyalty the way the president does. the response from the president himself and his legal team to specifically ami has been muted and careful. there s a question hanging over it, too. quickly before we go, who was this other campaign official that was in on the meeting in
may corroborate or contradict. they re going to report all of this, and the reader, the senate and the president, are going to have to decide who s telling the truth and what the credibility is. that s not the purview of a background investigation. they re not going to make credibility determinations. they re going to let the facts and statements speak for themselves. in some cases, they may be ambiguous. details are incredibly important in this type of scenario. and fresh, unstepped on statements from witnesses who haven t had a chance to coordinate with each other and have not heard each other s statements is important. that s the point right there, the fbi investigate it, they say this is what we got. and again, it s up to the senators to make the final decision. thanks very much. still to come, we re five weeks from the midterm elections. new polls show races, very key races, tightening for several inki
this is dangerous for anyone in society, we should all believe it should not beit political. we should believe in the presumption of innocence but many don t. watch this. this is a monumental defining moment this week when you have someone like him goinc to prison and in the same breath, kavanaugh possibly going to the highest court in the land. does he want america to believe that the only thing that he did until well into his college years was effectively case or french kiss a woman? is that it would he wants america to believe? and to be honest that s very much a white male republican defense. to say i was a virgin, i could not have potentially sexually assaulted a woman. if they go through a senate hearing, and it becomes a seat, circus, they push it through p and it passes, there will be as