court reporter, who will be sitting there taking down what he says. and then, of course, he can do the same with virginia, require her to sit for a deposition and require her to answer written interrogatories and require her to produce certain records as well, messages, e mails, texts and so forth, so virginia will be entitled to appear at his deposition. not to say anything, but to be there, she doesn t have to appear, but she has the right to appear, but she has the right to appear in the same way he would have appear in the same way he would have a right to appear at her deposition if he should choose. that is unlikely that he would choose to be there, but is a tailless will be there. that is what is up next. but his attorneys will be there. take us through some of the other options. one option is that prince andrew does not cooperate and does not take part in the process. what would that mean for the civil case?
fees will not be paid by the other party, according to this new texas law. the texas law essentially invites an avalanche of lawsuits to bury every abortion services provider in texas in litigation forever. there is no limit to the number of people who can sue over any individual abortion procedure. so one abortion to bury the receptionist at the clinic and everyone else at the clinics in written interrogatories sent to them by dozens or hundreds of lawyers who are suing them over that one procedure. they could then be forced to testify in depositions scheduled by dozens of lawyers suing them over the same event. the attorney fees in these situations would be incalculable. that is the risk faced by anyone in texas who is considering helping in any way in the delivery of abortion services to anyone are no matter when the
law. the texas law essentially invites an avalanche of lawsuits to bury every abortion service provided in texas in litigation forever. there is no limit to the number of people who can sue over any individual abortion procedure. so one abortion could very the receptionist at the clinic and everyone else at the clinic in written interrogatories sent to them by dozens of lawyers, or hundreds of lawyers who are suing them oh for that one procedure. they could then be forced to testify in depositions schedules by dozens of lawyers who are suing them over the same event. the attorneys fees in these situations would be incalculable. as of tonight, that is the risk faced by anyone in texas who is considering helping in any way in the delivery of abortion services to anyone, no matter when the pregnancy and the abortion might have occurred.
tossed. their argument is it s free speech. there s still not consensus what happened with the election. no, we re moving forward, said the judge. counselor, this is a trump-appointed judge, first of all, correct? so a trump-appointed judge opening up a world of potential hurt here for rudy giuliani and sidney powell and others. what s the most threatening aspect to them of this now? the idea that they could have to sit for depositions? robert? oh, yes, absolutely. the biggest thing that we have going on here is that this was kind of a pro forma or typical motion that is filed in court. but this judge disdainly may i add said that dominion made out a case at this point in time. they can certainly dispute, but what s going to happen, john, it s going to go into a discovery process they call it where they have to give not only sworn answers and interrogatories but more over, the nuclear bomb here for the three defendants is they have to give sworn depositions.
participants here, you said everyone can be found as aiding and abetting, or their own individual liability. how much more investigation would have to occur, the starr report, over 150 page report conducted by the attorney general s office? is that enough for the prosecution to take place, or do viewers have to look forward to another year of contemporaneous investigations for more accountability to have in customer mercedes: great question. this was such a thorough investigation, the 199 witnesses interviewed, it s likely to have enough evidence to bring that type of claim against those aiders and abettors. if there s anything that needs to be done in supplemental fashion, especially on the civil side, they can do it through discovery, some questions under interrogatories, impose individuals that will lead to other individuals.