i ve known a the issues, as long as they don t double dip the athletes on the state level, it s a legitimate way to raise the dollars from people. you could argue who could afford it and afly flfly apply to leg. do you see this as a precursor to other things and creative taxes that cities and states might try to implement? does this scare you a bit? this is the problem. it s accelerating. seeing states want to tax internet commerce, they need the money, they re in trouble. they re going to find more creative ways. mark scota, rick horrow, guys, one that s been out there for a while. people were surprised to hear it exists. appreciate you. see more about the jock tax. stay with us. in 2:30, i m going to confess my sins right here.
model for the internet, invariably depends on advertising, won t it hurt in the long run, internet commerce. i think it will because, one of the interesting things, you know, people might kind of like some of the things going on, let s say you were looking for a specialty item and had an interest in a particular pattern of china and maybe when you are on-line looking for china an ad says you can get this at a particular location, why shouldn t you have the right to do this, lis. and another but another part of the ad will pop up and say, do you want something that i have no desire to have, and i am angry, that they that will not pop up it has nothing do with you. but these no, but the problem is, the way these targeted ads are, they reach out broader than what you think, for your pattern of china and that really scares me. but you can hire a pop-up blocker. i m going to hire a pop up blocker and buy spend that kind of money and buy and take the time. get a bro
us for free, how the creep factor on the other hand, is so high, if i would go into the computer and know that everything i am doing is being tracked and telemarketers will come after me i ll go on the computer less and i ll be trying to do other things. i think that is a great point but i have a solution for that, and i think the private sector does. you can get a browser, that has built in a pop-up ad blocker. and a tracker blocker and these are technologically out there and it is the private sector. i agree but also the private sector is making the problem and how do you regulate the private sector. it is all voluntary now. i m with you on voluntary. that is fine but the next step is obama and his pals will try to regulate the internet and you know who makes these rules then? five political appoint teees, o the ftc. gregg: look, the economic
many of the premium brands in the united states. we sell cruises, help people with roadside assistance in the event they are stranded on the side of the road, customer service for many of the large retailers. jenna: the open positions are folks that could work from home and they would answer the calls for the different companies that you work with. 95% is inbound, there is not telemarketing or outbound selling that has to be done. jenna: what is making business so good for you right now that you can go out and hire thousands of people, what is working. people want to speak with someone around the corner not around the world. what we re finding is that the internet commerce is actually doubling. some of them are progressive retailers, for example reported by forrester are actually expecting about 15% of their business to occur online, and forrester says overall commerce online will move from about 7% to 20% in the next couple of years. jenna: a real growing industry. you know we had
i m not ruling on this yet. what you did is no congress has ever done before. that was the judge. judge hudson in washington, d.c. wait a minute, they re trying to do something they ve never done before. what they re trying to do that they ve never done before is force people to engage internet commerce. what s the significance of interstate commerce? it s a clause in the constitution that says they may regulate interstate commerce. in the name of that clause, congress is reported to regulate anything under the sun that in any way could affect interstate commerce. so what if the congress decides that the sun causes skin cancer? can it force us to buy and wear hats? a perfectly legitimate question in light of the fact that congress wants to force us as a condition of existing years to buy health insurance. the federal says congress has never forced anybody to engage in interstate commerce and the supreme court has never authorized it. that s why so had people are angry, because