fbi search of former president donald trump s home. now we are learning more about the events leading up to that search. two sources telling cnn, in june a trump lawyer signed a letter saying all documents marked as classified had been given back. that s what they re saying. but monday s search revealed mar-a-lago was still harboring top secrets, removing 11 sets of top secret gdocuments. we now know the justice department has probable cause to investigate three possible federal crimes, violations of the espionage act, obstruction of justice and criminal handling of government records. as of now no one has been charged with a crime. trump s first line of defense was to suggest that the fbi may have planted evidence while in his home. nobody has presented any evidence of that. plan b involved claiming that trump had declassified documents before the fbi seized them that the espionage act does not hinge on whether documents are classified. so the latest move is to blame the gov
donald trump wants to destroy watty but the destr country. and eventually he could destroy the worl thed. closing arguments in the trial of the centuryng argum. you are a gangster. why don t you? why? these young people aren t coming home to the democrats? because democratic messaging is ful democral. mocrat and talk about cost of living. the biden campaigns is blowing it. stop it. stop it. the il number s are not good. you know, the effects of climate change are alreadyane upon us in terms of our transportation indications that turbulencupon us e is up bt 15%. turbhey re blaming turbulencioe on global warming. i m down hereobal war. plus, who did america fight in the revolutionary war? africa. fox news alert. closing arguments just wrapping. up in president trump s trial. and if he comes out and talkins to the cameras, t we ll bring those comments to you. there s an oldalto cliche in criminal psychology. the criminal alway s returns to the scene of the crim
this isn t that massive, on a personal level, i don t think so. but on the other hand, i thought i see republicans getting the boom that they wanted an ability to move forward and cast biden as somebody that we should have questions about. look, there are questions in and there are facts. right now, there are just not the facts to substantiate that. it also doesn t help that hunter biden paid the tax money back. i do want to play this from bill barr earlier today, responding to the charges that came out. these charges, frankly, could ve been brought within the first few months after i became attorney general. i don t see why we ve waited five years if this all there is to it. this is, honestly, the thing that perplexes me the most. if this started in 2018, under trump, they were really looking for significant things, i would assume. why did it take five years to get to this point? hold on if you ve heard this before, it sounds like weaponization.
wing conspiracy theory, those circles, they were always saying, hashtag biden crime failing. many of us were saying, hey, that s too far. today, it kind of feels like republicans were right. i m sorry, on that point, the net was cast widely to include the subject matter of the very first impeachment proceedings. the entire biden family, listen, i m neutral as relates to whether this is actual charge coming down, but on the grand scheme of things, the idea of, maybe it s the context. we re now a nation where the historic impeachments and indictments are very different for former presidents. but to suggest that this is somehow as humongous as we are suggesting, seems disingenuous. this is the result. i think, in essence, what we re looking at here, a moment in which we re going to start to see parallels drawn where the ship could there shouldn t be any. there s gonna be talk about what about trump s children? what about chelsea clinton and that if i can get that out. that urged t
still may want to, at some point, get to a plea here to avoid having to show off classified documents or get in fights with agencies about what they can show and what they can t? i m sure the justice department will happily have a discussion about a plea deal with mr. trump. as your former guest said, i have no reasonably mr. trump is any way interested in a plea deal. what will be interesting to see, as they go through the classified discovery, and we get a sense of where the trial would go and how they would present this evidence and how they would handle presented to the jury, if there would be issues of providing substitutions or summaries instead of the actual documents, how much jack smith coordinated in advance with the other elements of the government, particular the intelligence community. saying, there s all these documents we got, i need a select group i can actually present at trial. and you guys won t lose it. actually, there s some indications that maybe that already