unfounded wiretap allegation took some interesting turns today. began with bipartisan members of the senate intelligence committee saying they ve seep no evidence that president obama ordered president trump s phones tapped during the campaign. came out at a perez briefing where sean spicer gave a long and winding and contradictory defense saying president trump stand by the claim. paul ryan and others have been briefed. here s what he told wolf blitzer a short time ago. we have not seen any evidence that there was a wiretap or a fisa court order against trump tower or somebody in trump tower. so should the president of the united states, do you believe, apologize to former president obama and apologize to the american people for making such an assertion? i m going to leave it to him to make his decisions. you still personally trust president trump? yes. back now with the panel. i was trying to remember an incident where the president or donald trump as a citizen really has
judge robart made yesterday in oral ruling. if i m understanding her correctly he simply put that in writing. that goes to we had two arguments. our first argument was the original injunction that judge robart in seattle applied to the first executive order should still apply to the second executive order. he denied that. we still have our main argument that of course like hawaii and maryland the new executive order should also be under an injunction and will be continuing our process with that claim. attorney general, both rulings last night, including one from your state of maryland, krilted the president s statements from the campaign trail about a muslim ban, one of the interviews i did with him at mar-a-lago. but campaign statements are often different from subsequent policy. why is it prudent to apply what the president said last year to this executive order? why isn t the executive order judged on its own? well, you know, no judge as the judge in maryland said is born yester