i want them to get back to their job of defending the country because it s weird how little you care about that. coming up, the white house is promising to appeal soon after two federal judges blocked the latest travel ban. and van is heading downstairs getting ready for his town hall. where s the car? it ll be here in three.uh, four minutes. are you kidding me? no, looks like he took a wrong turn. don t worry, this guy s got like a four-star rating, we re good. his name is randy. that s like one of the most trustworthy names! ordering a getaway car with an app? are you randy? that s me! awesome! surprising. what s not surprising? how much money erin saved by switching to geico. everybody comfortable with the air temp? i could go a little cooler. ok. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. i wanti did my ancestrydna and where i came from. and i couldn t wait to get my pie chart. the most shocking result was that i m 26% native american. i had no idea.
we asked him about that during the campaign and he couldn t if memory serves me correct, he couldn t come up. kayleigh, do you think he should? he should clarify, especially if it s not direct evidence of obama tapping trump. and i agree with van, twitter was not a place to raise this. i fully think there was something suspicious going on, maybe not orchestrated by president obama, people within, that s not hard to believe based on the felonious leaks we ve seen. so i do think there was something strange going on. i think they ll provide some sort of evidence of surveillance. whether it was ordered by the commander in chief, that s a far stretch. this is why twitter doesn t limit itself to making these allegations. if there s no evidence i think he should clarify like the democratic senator who tweeted she never met with the russians, i had no room in my office. congressman kingston, the current president of the united states calling the former president of the united states a ba
are allowed to look at motivation because it could have an anti-constitutional effect in the motivation behind it. that s what we re getting to. the statements behind it are what s causing concern from med ral judge after federal judge. six have looked at this and reached the identical conclusion. :i don t know. i have to say i spent the day with these two rules, they are both 43 pages long and focus so heavily on what donald trump said in the campaign. in all of american legal history, as far as i can tell, there has never been a court ruling that declared a president of a president unconstitutional based on something he said in the campaign. it never happened before because that s not how courts usually deal with questions like this
think there is widespread reporting throughout the 2016 investigation there was surveillance done on a variety of people that came up investigation whether there was i find it interesting that ow you his campaign that you of course they ll be looking at these various i get it. somehow you seem to believe you have all this information, you ve been read in on all these things which i find interesting. i haven t been read in by fbi. coming to serious conclusions for a guy who has zero intelligent class well give me some credit. i ll give you some. a little intelligence, maybe. clearance. i wasn t done. clearance. maybe both. those two panels. those two panels have spoke within the fbi director and i understand that. told there s no evidence of this. i think this question has been asked and answered. president saying it s interest hough you jump to all these conclusions about what they have and what they don t have and you seem to kno
gotten ahead of himself in terms of wiretapping versus surveillance. and maybe we will know something as he said last night to tucker carlson in the next couple of weeks. there will be more stuff coming out. that is sort of his poker tell. he often uses that phraseology of, you know, something big is coming or just wait or, you know, i m finding out some amazing things. he s a hollywood guy and there s that teaser element to him. it seems to always be out there. right. but i m going to quote paul ryan, i m going to let him make his decisions on terms of apologizing or taking it back. but i do think if we listen, part of what sean was saying is surveillance, wiretapping, almost synonymous in the usage, that would not be accept to believe many people, but i do remember you asked about him apologizing, during the campaign early august right afl kellyanne conway took over the campaign he did apologize in sort to the kahn family and other people for